Choose your location
Current selection
February 2026, From the Field
Health care is firmly in a new era of innovation, driven by ongoing advancements across biotech, life science tools and diagnostics, and managed care and distributors. These developments are steadily improving the sector’s prospects, creating compelling opportunities for investors. As it emerges from post‑pandemic challenges, and despite policy uncertainty and cost pressures, the overall outlook for health care looks increasingly favorable.
"Investors in this space will need to rely on rigorous research and a deep understanding of the scientific developments shaping innovation."
Sal Rais, Portfolio Manager
During broad market and technology sector sell‑offs, health care stocks historically have provided countercyclical exposure, typically offering more attractive valuations compared with the overall market. However, the sector’s inherent complexity makes thoughtful stock selection more important than ever. Investors in this space will need to rely on rigorous research and a deep understanding of the scientific developments shaping innovation.
Direct engagement with company management can also provide valuable insight into the forces shaping the health care sector. At the recent Buy-Side Healthcare CEO Summit in Q4 2025, our team met with industry leaders to discuss the latest trends and challenges. This white paper explores key themes from those discussions and examines what may lie ahead for the sector.
Medicines are among the most cost-effective interventions in health care. However, biotech and pharmaceutical companies face considerable research and development risks when developing new medicines, with only 10% to 15% of drugs ultimately reaching the market. Scientific progress has led to a deeper understanding of different diseases, enabling researchers to identify novel classes of medicines that can treat disorders more effectively.
At the same time, many leading large-cap pharmaceutical companies are entering the most significant patent expiry period the space has ever seen, with around USD 300 billion in mature drugs due to come off patent by 2030.1 This has accelerated mergers and acquisitions (M&A) across small- and mid-cap biotech companies throughout 2025 (see Figure 3), with around USD 138 billion in deal activity during the year.2 These developments have allowed biotech to meaningfully outperform after several years of lackluster performance.3
Source: T. Rowe Price analysis. B=Billion. M=Million.
* All figures are from company press releases and are estimates. Total Equity Value includes the upfront cost (immediate cash or stock payment to shareholders of the target company assuming a 100% acquisition of fully diluted shares) plus any Contingent Value Rights (estimated, risk-adjusted value of potential future milestone payments, if included as part of a given deal). Actual values may be higher or lower. Does not reflect all biotech M&A for 2025. Excludes private company transactions.
1 As of the end of January 2026, these transactions are not yet complete.
Please refer to the Appendix at the end for sources.
Innovation drives progress across key therapeutic biotech categories
(Fig. 4)
| Obesity |
|
|---|---|
| Alzheimer's disease |
|
| Cell therapy and genetic medicines |
|
YoY = Year-over-Year. E = Estimates by T. Rowe Price.
2023 data source: Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Single Year of Age and Sex for the United States: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2023 (NC_EST2023_SYASEXN), U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Release date: June 2024. The figures are developed from a base that integrates the 2020 Census, Vintage 2020 estimates, and 2020 Demographic Analysis estimates, adding births to, subtracting deaths from, and adding net migration to, the April 1, 2020 estimates base. For additional methodology and/or current census data, visit census.gov.
2024–2034 data source: Estimates by T. Rowe Price using Census Bureau data and other historical data. See end disclosure on economic and demographic estimates for additional information.
Actual future outcomes may differ materially from estimates and data shown is subject to change.
We expect this trend to continue. We believe there is opportunity in small- and mid‑cap biotech companies relative to large‑cap pharmaceuticals and in therapeutics such as obesity, Alzheimer’s disease, and cell therapies/genetic medicines. Outcomes for biotech companies are largely binary, with significant dispersion. This requires deep scientific diligence of each company’s drug development pipeline.
We believe many companies in the life sciences and diagnostics subsectors are well positioned to benefit indirectly from the potential wave of new medicines described in Figure 4. This space is filled with attractive-earnings per share potential “compounder” companies that have fallen out of favor over the last three years, as well as smaller innovative businesses in emerging diagnostic and therapeutic areas.
A key advantage of the life science tools and diagnostics space is that investors do not have to look for the biotech or drug class “winner.” The drug development innovation cycle, combined with aging demographics, is resulting in improving treatments, increased research activity, and higher prescription drug volumes. Together, these factors point to an accelerating organic growth trajectory in the near term and an industry that could grow well above gross domestic product over the long term.
After the spate of research activity and funding during the pandemic, the life sciences sector experienced a cyclical downturn for the first time, sparking investor confusion and uncertainty. This was coupled with turmoil in the academic and government end market. The pharmaceutical sector has also faced drug‑pricing uncertainty and the implementation of tariffs, which have weighed on research and new project activity.
In 2026 and beyond, however, the outlook looks positive. There is still significant support for academic and government research spending, while many pharmaceutical companies have made agreements with the U.S. administration on future drug pricing and tariffs. This should allow them to get back to business as usual and could even act as a tailwind to the life sciences sector as new facilities and production lines are brought online in the U.S. These agreements have instilled more confidence in the market overall, which has driven biotech valuations higher over the last 12 months. Increased biotech funding activity bodes well for research and development spending.
“...bioproduction is benefiting from the wave of new medicines...”
Mike Signore, Portfolio Manager
In life science tools and diagnostics, bioproduction (the use of living cells to product commercial products) is benefiting from the wave of new medicines—so companies in this space should be well positioned. In our view, an extended investment horizon is necessary to enable investors to fully capture the current tailwinds.
Life science tools and diagnostics sector to benefit from innovation surge as patent cliff approaches
(Fig. 6)
| Innovation continues, despite muted organic growth |
|
|---|---|
| Biosimilars: Loss of patent to boost drug volumes |
|
| China's biotech sector is growing |
|
| Biotech funding and M&A |
|
After a few tough years, we think the managed‑care space is filled with stocks that are underearning and trading at attractive relative valuations. We see opportunities across large-, mid-, and small-cap health insurers for outsized earnings growth as secular tailwinds continue and policy headwinds abate.
From 2015 through 2023, managed care was one of the best-performing S&P healthcare subsectors, with enrollment growth fueled by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), an aging population, pricing power, and government policy stability. However, over the last two years, managed‑care stocks have significantly underperformed.4 Health insurers faced earnings pressure following post-pandemic utilization and major government program changes across Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and the ACA.
As a result, industry margins for Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and the ACA exchanges are now breakeven or negative, and sector valuations are below historical long-term averages as the market remains unconvinced of a return to margin stability.
Investing in these stocks now requires a contrarian mindset. In our view, while it is impossible to predict the exact timing of margin improvement, break‑even or negative margins are not sustainable for this industry over the long term.
“Amid the increased complexity across biotech innovation, the specialty drug supply chain is a key area of focus.”
Maggie Brady, Investment Analyst
We believe the focus should be on the core tenets that make managed‑care stocks attractive, and those remain intact. Health insurers have typically been high return on equity businesses with pricing power and an ability to redesign benefits on an annual basis. They benefit from increasing health care spend on drugs and procedures and Americans’ need to purchase health insurance. We also think the long-term structural shift toward private sector benefit administration and away from government‑administered plans will continue.
The rise of specialty drug distribution
Amid the increased complexity across biotech innovation, the specialty drug supply chain is a key area of focus. We think the outlook is compelling for companies with market‑leading positions in specialty oncology drug distribution and dispensing.
We believe this dynamic should continue as pharmaceutical companies accelerate their focus on the specialty drug pipeline.
Specialty drugs are incredibly complex, requiring highly specific manufacturing and handling processes, intensive patient monitoring, and careful dispensing. These drugs also need to be distributed and dispensed to high-acuity patients at speed. The innovation presents a compelling opportunity for health care services companies that have market‑leading positions in specialty drug distribution via scaled physical infrastructure, manufacturer partnerships, and physician relationships.
Within specialty drug distribution, oncology is an area where drug spend is growing fast. In addition to the innovation, the patent cliff for oncology biologics and branded orals should provide an incremental tailwind to key players focused on this area of the supply chain
The health care sector’s next era will likely be defined by ongoing innovation and evolving market dynamics. While each key subsector faces distinct challenges and uncertainties, these are balanced by differentiated opportunities shaped by structural trends and scientific advances. In our view, a thoughtful, active approach is essential for navigating this complex health care landscape—working to pinpoint the standout companies while keeping track of emerging risks and pressure points.
Nov 2025
From the Field
1 Evaluate, “Portfolio Tactics to Scale the $300bn Patent Cliff,” October 13, 2025.
2 J.P. Morgan, biopharma and medtech activity in Q4 2025, as of January 7, 2026.
3 Based on the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. As of January 2026. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
4 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
T. Rowe Price cautions that economic or demographic estimates and forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual outcomes could differ materially from those anticipated in estimates and forward‑looking statements, and future results could differ materially from historical performance. Estimated information presented herein is shown for illustrative, informational purposes only. Any historical data used as a basis for analysis are based on information gathered by T. Rowe Price and from third-party sources and have not been verified. Forecasts are based on subjective estimates about market environments that may never occur. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. T. Rowe Price assumes no duty to, and does not undertake to, update forward-looking statements.
Risk Considerations: Health sciences firms are often dependent on government funding and regulation and are vulnerable to product liability lawsuits and competition from low‑cost generic product. Focusing investments in specific industries or sectors make investments more susceptible to adverse developments affecting those industries and sectors than a more broadly diversified investment.
Small and mid-cap stocks have generally been more volatile in price than large-cap stocks. International investments can be riskier than U.S. investments due to the adverse effects of currency exchange rates, differences in market structure and liquidity, as well as specific country, regional, and economic developments. These risks are generally greater for investments in emerging markets. Active investing may have higher costs than passive investing and may underperform the broad market or passive peers with similar objectives.
Additional Disclosures
Visit troweprice.com/glossary for definitions of financial terms.
Financial data and analytics provider FactSet. Copyright 2026 FactSet. All Rights Reserved.
Important Information
Where securities are mentioned, the specific securities identified and described are for informational purposes only and do not represent recommendations.
This material is being furnished for general informational purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. Investment involves risks. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.
The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.
Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.
Hong Kong—Issued by T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Limited, 6/F, Chater House, 8 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong. T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Limited is licensed and regulated by the Securities & Futures Commission (“SFC”). This material has not been reviewed by the SFC.
Singapore—Issued by T. Rowe Price Singapore Private Ltd. (UEN 201021137E), 501 Orchard Road, #10-02 Wheelock Place, Singapore 238880. T. Rowe Price Singapore Private Ltd. is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
© 2026 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, the Bighorn Sheep design and related indicators (see troweprice.com/ip) are trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Use does not imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation of T. Rowe Price with any of the trademark owners.