June 2026, From the Field
During his seminal Davos 2026 speech, Mark Carney, prime minister of Canada, declared the end of the rules‑based geopolitical order, describing it as a “rupture, not a transition.” Global equity markets tell a different story. Rather than rupturing under the weight of macroeconomic shocks, markets seem increasingly willing to absorb them and move on. The Middle East conflict and AI‑driven technology boom now represent the next great test of this new market order.
The market’s resilience has been building for some time.
The market’s resilience has been building for some time. Since 1970, the MSCI World Index has experienced 30 episodes of drawdowns reaching 10% or more. Intuitively, the deepest drawdowns should take the longest to heal. Yet recent corrections have been noticeably shallower and the recoveries faster. Four of the five fastest recoveries occurred after 1998, with three happening in the past decade. This clustering of “V‑shaped” recoveries is not an artifact of a few outliers; it is a defining feature of the modern market.
(Fig. 1) MSCI World Index—Recent corrections have been shallower and the recoveries faster
As of May 20, 2026.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.
Two forces explain this shift. First, policy reaction functions have changed. The responses to the global financial crisis and COVID pandemic show that central banks and fiscal authorities are willing to act quickly and forcefully in periods of market and economic stress. Forward guidance, emergency facilities, and large‑scale balance sheet operations have compressed the depth and duration of many risk‑off episodes. Put simply, every time the market falls off its bike, the authorities wipe its knee.
Second, market structure has evolved. The rise of indexation, systematic investment strategies, and options based hedging has changed both selling pressure and subsequent demand. Forced de-risking can drive rapid price moves on the way down, but once volatility normalizes, balanced and target volatility strategies can mechanically re‑risk, generating equally rapid flows back into risk assets.
Retail participation has reinforced this pattern, particularly in the U.S. Retail investors have tended to buy the dips and in periods of elevated volatility. They are also more narrative‑driven than fundamentals‑driven, which may help explain why dominant U.S. growth franchises have been so quick to recover.
...you have to squint to see an international crisis unfolding.
Could this be why global equities—particularly the dominant U.S. growth franchises—merely blinked as the Middle East crisis emerged? Markets have since rebounded above previous highs at a speed that would once have been considered extraordinary. Likewise, if you look at bond yields or corporate earnings, you have to squint to see an international crisis unfolding.
We believe this is an economic tale of twin shortages: oil and compute. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has tightened crude and refined product markets, while the AI revolution has created a shortage of compute power and advanced semiconductor chips. The former is inflationary and ultimately demand‑destroying. The latter is growth‑generating, driving investment, productivity expectations and a step‑up in corporate earnings we have not seen in years.
Bond markets are beginning to register the energy shock, but not yet in a disorderly way. Higher oil prices create a stagflationary mix: rising input costs alongside weaker real incomes and softer demand. Short‑term inflation expectations have edged higher, while longer‑term measures remain broadly anchored, suggesting investors still trust central banks to absorb another shock.
Equities, meanwhile, are focused on the other shortage: compute. The S&P 500 delivered a first‑quarter earnings surprise of 19%1—three times the typical beat—while U.S. large‑cap margins reached a high of 14.2%.2 As long as the AI investment trend continues, and rates remain orderly, the chip and compute shortage appears to have the upper hand. Bull markets of this force are usually derailed not by geopolitical shocks alone, but by rapidly rising bond yields (see Figure 2).
1979-1982 |
Aggressive Fed tightening pushed the U.S. Treasury yield up from 10.3% in October 1979 to 15.32% in September 1981 (+502bps). |
1987 |
10‑year U.S. Treasury yields rose from 7.08% in January to 9.52% in October, exposing stretched valuations ahead of Black Monday (+244bps). |
1989-1990 |
Bank of Japan tightening lifted the Japanese government bond yield from 4.8% in January 1989 to 8.03% in September 1990, puncturing one of history’s largest asset bubbles (+323bps). |
2022 |
The fastest Fed hiking cycle in decades led to the U.S. Treasury yield rising from 1.76% in January to 3.98% in October (+222bps). |
As of May 20, 2026.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.
None of these explanations is entirely satisfying. It may be that the market is right to deflect the inflation shock as temporary, to disregard the dire fiscal position of governments everywhere. Growth is the great redeemer, and it may be that we are looking at an AI productivity Nirvana. The evidence of this is yet to show up in the data, but for the moment, markets remain resilient and buying the dips remains a sound strategy. They are “un-ruptured.”
Apr 2026
From the Field
Article
Mar 2026
In the Loop
Article
1 Source: Factset as of March 31, 2026. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. Typical beats are calculated on rolling 5-year and 10-year historical medians for S&P 500 aggregate EPS surprise percentages as at March 31, 2026.
2 Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of May 28, 2026.
Additional Disclosures
Visit troweprice.com/glossary for definitions of financial terms.
Please see vendor indices for more information, including definitions and source data: troweprice.com/marketdata.
Important Information
Outside of the United States, this is intended for investment professional use only. Not for further distribution.
This material is being furnished for informational and/or marketing purposes only and does not constitute an offer, recommendation, advice, or solicitation to sell or buy any security.
Prospective investors should seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services.
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal.
Information presented has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness. The views contained herein are those of the author(s), are as of May 2026, are subject to change, and may differ from the views of other T. Rowe Price Group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.
All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from any estimates or forward‑looking statements provided.
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.
Australia—Issued by T. Rowe Price Australia Limited (ABN: 13 620 668 895 and AFSL: 503741), Level 28, Governor Phillip Tower, 1 Farrer Place, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia. For Wholesale Clients only.
Canada—Issued in Canada by T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc.’s investment management services are only available to non‑individual Accredited Investors and non‑individual Permitted Clients as defined under National Instrument 45‑106 and National Instrument 31‑103, respectively. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. enters into written delegation agreements with affiliates to provide investment management services.
EEA—Unless indicated otherwise this material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price (Luxembourg) Management S.à r.l. 35 Boulevard du Prince Henri L‑1724 Luxembourg which is authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. For Professional Clients only.
New Zealand—Issued by T. Rowe Price Australia Limited (ABN: 13 620 668 895 and AFSL: 503741), Level 28, Governor Phillip Tower, 1 Farrer Place, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia. No Interests are offered to the public. Accordingly, the Interests may not, directly or indirectly, be offered, sold or delivered in New Zealand, nor may any offering document or advertisement in relation to any offer of the Interests be distributed in New Zealand, other than in circumstances where there is no contravention of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
Switzerland—Issued in Switzerland by T. Rowe Price (Switzerland) GmbH, Talstrasse 65, 6th Floor, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland. For Qualified Investors only.
UK—This material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price International Ltd, Warwick Court, 5 Paternoster Square, London EC4M 7DX which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. For Professional Clients only.
USA—Issued in the USA by T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., distributor and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., investment adviser, 1307 Point Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, which are regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, respectively.
© 2026 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. Rowe Price, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, the Bighorn Sheep design, and related indicators (see troweprice.com/ip) are trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Use does not imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation of T. Rowe Price with any of the trademark owners.