China and Brazil Look to the Future
China’s growth objective takes the driving seat
China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) completed its 2016 meetings in March, and unsurprisingly, growth was at the top of the agenda. The growth target was set at 6.5%–7.0%—a range that ensures that the current leadership delivers on the previous leadership’s promise to double incomes by 2020. To halt the multiyear growth slowdown, the authorities will pull a number of levers to make funds available for infrastructure projects and to support the housing market.
The leadership also hinted at supply-side reforms and acknowledged the need to tackle the excess capacity issues. Unfortunately, the reform objectives appear to have been subordinated to the growth objectives, and over the short term, the two are incompatible. One of the admirable goals of the supply-side reforms is to turn large, inefficient, and unprofitable state-owned enterprises into efficient, profitable businesses by revamping management practices and reducing the tax burden. But judging from the sound bites from the NPC, we should not expect too much progress on the efficiency front in the immediate future.
With regard to excess capacity, the Chinese leadership has a problem in that shutting down coal mines and steel mills will lead to rising unemployment. The problem here is less to do with the overall level of employment than with the concentration of unemployment in specific regions. As always, in China, social stability is the sine qua non, and concentrated unemployment leads to discontent and protests. The communication from the NPC suggests that the leadership is unwilling to run the risk of rising unemployment, and consequently, progress on capacity reduction in the heavy industries will be gradual.
Given the emphasis on supporting growth, we should expect activity indicators to show some signs of stabilization over the coming months. And although any growth bounce is unlikely to be long lasting, it could still alleviate some of the market’s fears about a hard landing in China. The big question is whether the market will be fooled into thinking that all is well as China ventures into another credit-fueled stimulus program that compounds the imbalances of the economy or whether the market looks through the near-term growth data and focuses on the longer-term challenges. My guess is that improving growth data will provide enough short-term comfort for markets and support risk sentiment.
No short-term fix for Brazil
The Brazilian financial markets have staged an outsized rally over the past few months. In part, this has been driven by improved global risk sentiment and by an important (though temporary?) improvement in the terms of trade. However, the rally also reflects the fact that the corruption scandal that has plagued the country for the past 18 months or so is rapidly progressing toward its apex. The regime of the Workers’ Party is crumbling as the corruption scandal has exposed a political system that is corrupt to its core.
By appointing former President Lula da Silva as her chief of staff, current President Dilma Rousseff hoped to garner enough support in the lower house to quell the growing threat of impeachment. It seems unlikely to work: The evidence appears overwhelmingly unfavourable to the president, and a change at the helm of the government is likely. However, while impeaching the president would remove some of the policy paralysis that has kept the country captive over the past 18 months, it is unlikely to bring about conditions under which badly needed structural reforms can be implemented; the tentacles of corruption spread throughout the Brazilian political system, and the investigation is unlikely to end with the removal of the president.
2016-GL-3667
重要資訊
本文件(包括其中所載的任何陳述、資訊、數據和內容)以及與本文件一併提供的任何資料、資訊、圖像、連結、聲音、圖像或視頻(統稱為「資料」)乃由普信提供,並僅作一般資訊用途。本資料並不擬供在禁止或限制分發本資料的司法管轄區和在本資料須按特定要求提供的若干國家之人士使用。本資料不擬派發予任何司法管轄區的散戶投資者。在任何情況下,本資料的全部或部分內容均不得在未經普信同意下複製或再分發或出示予任何人士。本資料並不構成於任何司法管轄區分銷、要約、邀請、建議或徵求發售或購買任何證券。本資料並未經由任何司法管轄區的任何監管機關審閱。本資料並不構成任何投資意見,不得加以依賴。投資者務請在作出任何投資決策前先尋求獨立法律和財務意見(包括有關稅務後果的意見)。