The greatest fixed income investment opportunity in decades?

Are you ready for a world where the 10‑year U.S. Treasury yield goes to 6%? According to our Head of Global Fixed Income and CIO Arif Husain, this scenario—unthinkable just a few years ago—has become a real possibility in the next 18 months due to U.S. fiscal expansion and the potential for tariffs to drive inflation higher.

Let’s explore why such a shift may occur, what the asset allocation implications are, and what strategies may help effectively navigate this landscape.

The path to higher bond yields—three key drivers

1. Fiscal concerns: The recently enacted “One Big Beautiful Bill” looks likely to keep the U.S. deficit elevated for at least the next two to three years, as stimulus is frontloaded and spending cuts are backloaded. Consequently, fiscal concerns will persist, as the deficit must be financed through Treasury debt issuance. This will occur at a time when other developed markets also need to issue more government debt to finance deficits, creating competition for buyers and pressuring yields higher.
2. Upside inflation risks: The pass-through to consumer prices from tariffs is likely to be greater than markets anticipate, driving inflation higher in the second half of this year. Blerina Uruçi, our chief U.S. economist, estimates that a 15% effective tariff rate could increase annual headline inflation by between 1.0 and 1.6 percentage points.
3. Global growth to hold up: While tariff policy may keep global growth below trend, a recession is unlikely. All three of the world’s largest economies—the U.S., the eurozone, and China—are fiscally expanding right now, which should be supportive. The effects may take time to feed through, however.

(Fig. 1) Three key reasons Treasury yields should go higher

As of July 2025. For illustrative purposes only.
Source: T. Rowe Price.

x

The confluence of these three factors means that Treasury yields should go higher, with a 6% 10‑year yield within the realm of possibility. The path to that level will be volatile. However, it’s worth highlighting how far the 10‑year Treasury yield has already moved. In March 2020, it was below 0.5%; now it’s above 4%.¹ With this context, a move to 5% or even 6% doesn’t seem so large. If it happens, we believe it would create a historic investment opportunity in fixed income, with meaningful implications for asset allocation. We think it’s crucial to begin planning now.

Potential implications

The share of fixed income in asset allocation has been growing in recent years thanks to higher bond yields. A rise in the 10‑year yield to above 6% would amplify this trend as it would offer investors a generational opportunity to earn the most attractive income from bonds in decades. For example, the yield on the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (Agg)—a widely used benchmark for U.S. investment grade bonds—would likely surpass 6% in that scenario, a level not seen since the early 2000s.

For perspective, the Agg averaged a yield of just above 2% between December 29, 2011, and December 31, 2021. During this period, investors were compelled to take on more risk in equity and alternative markets to help them meet their return goals. Although bond yields have risen in recent years, leading to investors adding back to fixed income, they still remain an underweight allocation for many. This dynamic could change if the 10‑year yield increases to 6% as sectors sensitive to Treasuries—such as investment grade and high yield—would also likely increase, potentially offering equity‑like returns. This would appeal to investors not only from a total return perspective, but also due to the stability of income as bonds are historically less volatile than stocks. Nonetheless, fundamental research remains crucial to reduce default risk.

"From an asset allocation perspective, the potential implications are significant, as investors might not need to hold as much equity."
Jeff Helsing, Institutional Fixed Income Strategist

From an asset allocation perspective, the potential implications are significant, as investors might not need to hold as much equity. For example, if an investor is seeking a return goal of, say 7%, this could hypothetically be achieved through a higher allocation to bonds, which are typically less volatile than equities. However, investors would be exposed to more duration risk if they increase their fixed income allocation.²

Considerations for navigating this evolving fixed income landscape

A higher fixed income allocation seems like an obvious choice if yields get to 6%, but what about the intervening period? Navigating the rising yield path is as important as what to do when the destination is reached. 

In the current evolving market environment, we recommend investors consider adopting a curve steepening bias. The prospect of U.S. interest rate cuts should anchor the short‑end of the U.S. yield curve, while expectations for higher inflation, robust growth, and fiscal dynamics are likely to drive long‑term Treasury yields higher. Additionally, consider adding inflation‑linked bonds and exploring opportunities in markets or sectors that are potentially less correlated to core markets.

Regarding approaches, consider strategies with a global remit that can invest across a wide range of geographies, sectors, and security types as this may help with diversification. Furthermore, a flexible strategy, particularly in managing duration, is crucial as volatility is expected. Therefore, the ability to respond to the market environment and make changes will be important.

Conclusion

We believe that a rise in the 10‑year Treasury yield to 6% would present a historic investment opportunity in fixed income with significant implications for asset allocation. Investors might not need as much equity or equity-like exposure to achieve return goals in such a scenario as bonds could offer stock-like returns with potentially less volatility. This doesn’t mean that investors should sit and wait for this big shift to happen—there are strategies they can consider now in preparation. This includes adding inflation‑linked bonds and implementing a steepening bias as investors are not being compensated yet for the duration risk further out the curve. As yields move closer to 6%, longer maturities should start to become attractive again.

"Navigating the rising yield path is as important as what to do when the destination is reached."
Som Priestley, CFA, Head of Multi Solutions—North America