Skip to main content

Choose your location

Current selection

Sweden
English
Canada
United States
Asia Regional
Australia
New Zealand
Austria
Belgium
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom

Download

Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:

Download

Share Class: Language of the document:

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
Subscriptions
OK
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the twenty four-year period ended June 30, 2020, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest

March 2022 / MARKETS & ECONOMY

Making Sense of the Sell-Off, Then Rally in Chinese ADRs

Concerns about delistings on U.S. exchanges appear to be overblown

Key Insights

 
  • Worries that American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) of Chinese firms could be delisted due to new U.S. regulations appear to be excessive.
  • Beijing has shown a willingness to help these companies comply with the auditing requirements, while U.S. and Chinese regulators are working together to address these issues. 
  • Many Chinese companies with ADRs already have secondary listings. There is time for remaining companies to set up a primary or secondary listing on another exchange.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) demand for detailed audit documents from U.S.-listed Chinese firms recently contributed to a wave of selling in their American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) amid worries these firms could be delisted. But we feel the panic around this event was excessive and that the current rebound in Chinese ADRs is justified.

For one thing, the U.S. government has been open in its actions. The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (HFCAA) was passed at the end of 2020 and requires that the SEC ban companies from trading in the U.S. if the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the federal audit watchdog overseen by the SEC, is unable to inspect their audits for three consecutive years. The recent news that the SEC identified five companies at risk of such a ban in 2024 shouldn’t come as a big surprise.

Meanwhile, Beijing has shown a willingness to help these companies comply with the auditing requirements. The PCAOB and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) are working together to address these issues. Hong Kong Exchange (HKEX) authorities are also facilitating an easier homecoming for those companies that would like to list in Hong Kong. Both developments should help reassure investors. 

The concerns over the ADRs have added to a number of questions that have hovered over Chinese stocks recently.

The concerns over the ADRs have added to a number of questions that have hovered over Chinese stocks recently. That includes rising COVID-19 cases, geopolitical tensions, China’s focus on deleveraging, regulations, and slowing growth. The result has been a significant swing in equity markets, moving from the largest sell-off in Chinese stocks since 2008 to a more recent surge that was the largest two-day climb in Chinese stocks in more than 20 years. 

We expect more names to be added to the initial list of five companies—BeiGene, Yum China, Zai Lab, ACM Research, and Hutchmed China—that the PCAOB identified. However, many Chinese companies with ADRs have already secured secondary listings in Hong Kong, with the Hong Kong Exchange having loosened its listing requirements to accommodate the demand from ADRs for a secondary listing or dual listing. Ahead of the 2024 deadline, companies like Yum China have already completed a Hong Kong share listing. This means their shares could continue trading even if they were delisted from U.S. markets.

The process of converting holdings from ADRs to HKEX shares is quite simple and quick. Investors can typically instruct the custodian to convert ADRs into Hong Kong shares without restrictions. The depositary will be canceled, and the custodian will deliver the Hong Kong shares to the investor with the entire process taking about two business days electronically and involving a reasonable cost. This should help minimize any impact on these securities. 

Trading Liquidity Boost

While investors are concerned about trading liquidity in Hong Kong being lower relative to the U.S. market, we believe this could change in the future as volumes are expected to pick up with an increasing number of investors converting their ADR holdings into HKEX-listed shares. Although a portion of institutional investors holding ADRs may not be able to trade in Hong Kong, this could be compensated by increased flows from mainland Chinese investors who can buy dual- and primary-listed companies in Hong Kong via the Southbound Stock Connect scheme.

Mainland Chinese companies interested in raising funds overseas have used the variable interest entities (VIE) structure to circumvent a law under which Beijing prohibits direct foreign investment in certain industries. Recently, such structures have come under renewed scrutiny after China issued new guidelines for the platform economy. 

While investors are concerned about trading liquidity in Hong Kong being lower relative to the U.S. market, we believe this could change in the future as volumes are expected to pick up with an increasing number of investors converting their ADR holdings into HKEX-listed shares.

The VIE structure is, in fact, not a focus of the HFCAA. If the CSRC approves a Hong Kong listing of a company with the VIE structure in the coming few months, this can be viewed as an implicit approval of VIE structures by the market.

Comfortable With ADR Exposure 

T. Rowe Price strategies that have invested in ADRs have done so primarily due to the deeper pools of liquidity in the U.S. markets. We remain comfortable with our holdings as these companies are either dual listed or are open to listing in Hong Kong. We also don’t think the developments with the ADR regulations alter our investment theses, which are rooted in company fundamentals and in-depth analysis.

It is important to remember that Chinese ADR stocks will not be delisted immediately. The HFCAA requires companies to comply to auditing standards within three years of being put on notice by the SEC, as has happened to the first five companies to be named. This is more than enough time for companies to set up a secondary—or even a primary—listing on another exchange. Since many Chinese ADRs already have a secondary listing, we think there is a low likelihood that their shares will ever become untradeable. 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Previous Article

March 2022 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS

How We Are Navigating Upheaval in Energy Markets
Next Article

March 2022 / POLICY INSIGHTS

U.S. Fiscal Stimulus: Takeaways for Investors
202203-2088501

March 2022 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS

Assessing the ESG Implications of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Assessing the ESG Implications of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Assessing the ESG Implications of Russia’s...

Pressure to reduce dependence on Russian gas could expedite Europe’s energy transition

By Maria Elena Drew

Maria Elena Drew Director of Research, Responsible Investing

You are now leaving the T. Rowe Price website

T. Rowe Price is not responsible for the content of third party websites, including any performance data contained within them. Past performance cannot guarantee future results.