Skip to main content

Download

Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:

Download

Share Class: Language of the document:

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
Subscriptions
OK
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the twenty four-year period ended June 30, 2020, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest

22 November 2022 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS

After Goldilocks, Which Bear (Market) Will Prevail?

A clearer picture of the U.S. market outlook should emerge over the coming weeks

Key Insights

 
  • Amid ongoing market uncertainty, the near‑term outlook in the U.S. should begin to reveal itself more clearly by the end of 2022.
  • While conditions are expected to remain challenging, we could see three potential bear market scenarios—mild, moderate, or longer lasting.
  • If investors gain confidence that the inflation outlook is improving, a more moderate outcome is likely, which could augur well for growth stocks in 2023.

The U.S. economic outlook remains highly uncertain, but we believe the environment will begin to reveal itself more clearly—good, bad, or somewhere in between—by the end of 2022. This does not necessarily mean that markets will be quick to respond, and discount appropriately, but we should gain a reasonable idea about how the dust is settling in the U.S. reasonably soon. With the next Federal Reserve (Fed) interest rate‑setting meeting on December 14, there is one further inflation print to be released before that time. With the latest U.S. inflation data coming in below expectations, this remaining data point takes on added significance.

As it currently stands, we believe that we could see three possible economic scenarios play out in the U.S. as we move into the new year. To elaborate on these and on other key questions about the U.S. market outlook in 2023, we spoke with Taymour Tamaddon, portfolio manager of the T. Rowe Price US Large‑Cap Growth Equity Strategy.

1.  Can you elaborate on the three possible economic scenarios and how you see U.S. equities—particularly growth stocks—faring in each?

The mild bear. The first possible scenario is that the Federal Reserve manages to orchestrate a relatively quick soft landing. This is undoubtedly the best outcome as far as growth investors are concerned. However, at the same time, we think this is the most unlikely outcome, given where we are currently, and the high degree of uncertainty that remains. In this scenario, interest rates do not have to go much higher, inflation recedes quite quickly in response to rate rises, and economic growth remains generally solid, with modest expansion that is ultimately not too hot and not too cold. However, the probability of this scenario being landed appears slim, in our view.

The moderate bear. This second scenario is the one that we believe to be the most likely outcome—is that we experience a mild recession, but where interest rate rises are soon sufficient to gradually slow the economy and tame inflation from current elevated levels. In this scenario, our expectation is for a few quarters of slowing growth, with inflation gradually inching down, before ultimately seeing early signs of a recovery from mid‑2023.

In such an environment, growth becomes harder to find, and higher‑quality companies with stronger fundamentals, better business operations, and quality management are likely to be rewarded by investors. This is a supportive backdrop for growth investors as individual company quality becomes the principal market driver, rather than being driven by macroeconomic factors or investment momentum. And in a mild recessionary environment, those companies that can continue to grow their earnings, competitive leadership, and market share in the absence of a strong gross domestic product tailwind tend to be growth‑oriented companies, moreso than their value counterparts.

The longer lasting bear. The third possible scenario—and the one that would prove most difficult for investors generally—is an environment in which uncertainty continues to prevail, where the Federal Reserve is unable to gain control of inflation, and it remains unclear how high interest rates will need to go in order to reinstate price stability. In this environment, the market continues to fluctuate, and volatility remains prevalent as investors remain unsure as to whether the Fed has done enough. This high degree of ongoing market uncertainty and fragile sentiment is the least supportive background for growth investors. The lack of clarity regarding the direction of travel will likely see investors gravitate toward defensive market areas and away from more growth‑oriented stocks and sectors.

2.  What insights can be derived from the sharp bear market rally in July, particularly for growth investors?

As far as U.S. bear market rallies go, the length of the July rally—approximately four weeks in duration—was not unusual. What was unusual, however, were some of the significant movements with some stocks registering gains of more than 100% in the short time that the rally lasted. This was noteworthy as it provided perhaps the first indication since the end of 2021 of just how compressed valuation multiples have become in certain areas. Amid a backdrop of intense market pressure and steep declines, particularly in growth‑oriented sectors (Fig. 1), we had an indication that things might be improving after July’s consumer price index reading came in at 8.5%, down from 9.1% in June. While this ultimately proved short‑lived, the brief window of optimism provided an insight into what could happen if the market was to gain confidence that inflation was under control and that the economic cycle might be improving.

The Magnitude of the Sell‑Off

(Fig. 1) Growth‑oriented sectors have seen steep declines

The Magnitude of the Sell‑Off

December 31, 2021–September 30, 2022.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Source for Russell Index Data: London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the “LSE Group”). T. Rowe Price uses the current MSCI/S&P Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) for sector and industry reporting. T. Rowe Price will adhere to all updates to GICS for prospective reporting. Please see Additional Disclosures page for information about this FTSE Russell and GICS information.

3.  What do you think needs to happen before U.S. inflation begins to ease from its current high levels?

For current high U.S. inflation levels to moderate, we think that consumer spending needs to slow noticeably. Unless consumers start to rein in spending, it will be very difficult to see a demonstrable reduction in inflation. This obviously has much to do with personal consumption but also how secure people feel about their overall wealth, which is closely linked to how comfortable they feel about the value of their biggest asset, i.e., their home. I think we also need to see some evidence of U.S. house prices coming down to help lower inflation.

Looking at the balance sheet of the U.S. consumer currently, it is generally in pretty good shape following the coronavirus pandemic, with stimulus checks coming through during the period, while, at the same time, opportunities for spending became more limited. So, the average U.S. household savings rate is reasonably healthy right now. This is great from a consumer perspective, but it makes things more difficult to predict in terms of the market outlook, as consumers have more confidence, and a bit more time, in our view, to continue spending.

4.  What impact has the current uncertainty had on U.S. company earnings, and growth company earnings, in particular?

While we have various significant macro influences playing out currently, there are also idiosyncratic influences impacting many companies. The highly uncertain backdrop has made it very difficult for companies to gauge demand for their products and services, causing many to lower guidance and, in some cases, withdraw it altogether.

The highly uncertain backdrop has made it very difficult for companies to gauge demand for their products and services, causing many to lower guidance and, in some cases, withdraw it altogether.

There are likely to be further surprises from U.S. companies that have been impacted by supply issues or that have mis‑forecast the demand environment. This is being reflected in prices—we have already seen significant compression in valuation multiples this year, particularly among growth stocks. The big question now: Has the market appropriately discounted the valuations of these businesses, depending on what the earnings profiles look like moving forward? This is a very imprecise science, and it places a huge importance on companies delivering earnings in an environment where multiples have already been significantly compressed.

5.  As a U.S. portfolio manager, is now the time to be increasing one’s risk profile, adding exposure to companies likely to perform well in the early stages of a new economic cycle?

We are not looking to increase the risk profile of our portfolio. While U.S. large‑cap growth companies have suffered over the past year, we are not trying to play catch‑up by changing our risk profile now that the market has come down significantly. We continue to simply look for good‑quality growth ideas where we think there is good potential for the company to deliver earnings and decent growth. For example, we currently like certain health insurance stocks, which is an industry that we think offers durable growth, as well as select information technology stocks. These are companies that we think can do well in the current environment, but, at the same time, we do not feel the need to significantly increase our positions in these names, upping the risk to potentially capture big rewards.

As we gain confidence that the environment is improving and that these businesses are growing earnings, we may look to scale them up within the portfolio. We are trying to maintain a consistent level of risk within the portfolio until we feel a lot more confident about the environment and the general market outlook, at which point we may look to further increase some of our highest‑conviction ideas.

 

Risks

The following risks are materially relevant to the portfolio.

Style—Style risk may impact performance as different investment styles go in and out of favor depending on market conditions and investor sentiment.

General Portfolio Risks

Equity—Equities can lose value rapidly for a variety of reasons and can remain at low prices indefinitely.
ESG and Sustainability—ESG and sustainability risk may result in a material negative impact on the value of an investment and performance of the portfolio.
Geographic Concentration—Geographic concentration risk may result in performance being more strongly affected by any social, political, economic, environmental or market conditions affecting those countries or regions in which the portfolio’s assets are concentrated.
Hedging—Hedging measures involve costs and may work imperfectly, may not be feasible at times, or may fail completely.
Investment Portfolio—Investing in portfolios involves certain risks an investor would not face if investing in markets directly.
Management—Management risk may result in potential conflicts of interest relating to the obligations of the investment manager.
Market—Market risk may subject the portfolio to experience losses caused by unexpected changes in a wide variety of factors.
Operational—Operational risk may cause losses as a result of incidents caused by people, systems, and/or processes.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Previous Article

November 2022 / VIDEO

Waiting on the Fed?
Next Article

November 2022 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS

Impact Investing in Credit: Debunking Four Common Misconceptions
202211-2603440

You are now leaving the T. Rowe Price website

T. Rowe Price is not responsible for the content of third party websites, including any performance data contained within them. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.