Skip to main content

Download

Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:

Download

Share Class: Language of the document:

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
Subscriptions
OK
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the twenty four-year period ended June 30, 2020, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest

T. Rowe Price

Please enter valid search characters

October 2020 / BLOG

Federal Spending Could Be a Catalyst for Industrials

Sector is particularly sensitive to economic conditions

The potential size and scope of future federal spending bills to bolster the economy, especially an infrastructure measure, would have important implications for the industrials sector.

After passing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, President Donald Trump issued an infrastructure agenda that never resulted in legislation. Should he win reelection, Trump could push for a package targeting surface transportation improvements—measures to repair roads and bridges—along with airports and other critical infrastructure. Democratic candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden, by contrast, has called for an ambitious plan to fund traditional infrastructure projects while also investing heavily in clean power and energy efficiency.

The ultimate shape of either candidate’s infrastructure plan would depend heavily on the balance of power in the Senate.

If implemented, Biden’s expansive plans could accelerate the push for energy efficiency and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions—a secular trend that would affect companies specializing in air compressors, rail, commercial aircraft, electric vehicles, and industrial gases.

The ultimate shape of either candidate’s infrastructure plan would depend heavily on the balance of power in the Senate.

Regardless of which candidate wins the presidential election, Jason Adams, portfolio manager of the Global Industrials Equity Strategy, believes some type of infrastructure bill is likely—which could be a boost to machinery and construction companies.

Trade Policy

The next president’s trade policies would also have important implications for industrials companies, which typically sell their products overseas and operate global supply chains. Both candidates have espoused a tough approach to China, though their strategies and goals would differ.

During his first term, Trump’s push to narrow the U.S. trade deficit through punitive tariffs created higher uncertainty, regulatory scrutiny, and costs for industrials with multinational operations. We believe that trade tensions with China likely would intensify if the Republican were to win reelection. At the same time, Trump might also seek to redefine U.S.‑EU trade relations, potentially increasing the risk of further tariffs.

All signs suggest that, as president, Biden would also take a tough stance toward China on market practices and human rights issues, though he would likely seek multilateral partnerships and engage levers beyond trade in any renegotiation of the U.S.‑China relationship.

Onshoring American Industry

...factory automation could be a relative beneficiary if global supply chains continue to be localized.

- Jason Adams, Portfolio Manager, Global Industrials Equity Strategy

The challenges the U.S. faced in sourcing personal protective equipment and other critical medical equipment during the coronavirus pandemic demonstrated the country’s need for secure and readily accessible supplies in the event of a crisis. These concerns about supply chain security could buttress the Trump administration’s efforts to encourage the reshoring of American industry through tax credits and tariffs. Initial efforts would likely focus on targeted health care and technology supply chains but could extend to critical technologies in the industrials sector. Biden, too, has voiced support for onshoring strategically critical American industries. Adams says he thinks that “factory automation could be a relative beneficiary if global supply chains continue to be localized.”

Environmental Regulation

President Trump’s deregulation efforts have removed and weakened environmental rules, lessening compliance costs for some U.S. manufacturing and heavy industry companies. This trend is likely to continue if he were to secure another term.

A Biden administration would seek to strengthen environmental regulations, likely making them even stricter than those implemented under former President Barack Obama. For example, Biden has supported classifying perfluoralalkyl and polyfluoralalkyl chemicals (PFAS, collectively) as “hazardous substances,” a designation that would require enforceable maximum limits on their presence in drinking water. The prevalence of these manmade substances in many industries and products could saddle polluters with remediation costs.

Political and policy outcomes aside, Adams believes that industrials stocks could benefit “once investors’ focus shifts to the business cycle ahead,” citing the possibility of synchronized economic growth in key economies “as a potentially positive catalyst for the sector.”

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Previous Article

October 2020 / Video

US High Yield Bond: What makes us different?
Next Article

October 2020 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS

Why ESG Is Integral to Analysis of Mining Companies
202010‑1365641

September 2020 / Blog

Federal Help Wanted: Municipalities Face...

Federal Help Wanted: Municipalities Face Fiscal Uncertainties

Federal Help Wanted: Municipalities Face...

U.S. election could impact ailing municipal budgets

By Katie Elizabeth Deal

Katie Elizabeth Deal Investment Analyst

August 2020 / Blog

Potential Winners and Losers from Biden's...

Potential Winners and Losers from Biden's Climate Plan

Potential Winners and Losers from Biden's...

Regulations would affect the energy sector and automotive industry

By Katie Elizabeth Deal

Katie Elizabeth Deal Investment Analyst

You are now leaving the T. Rowe Price website

T. Rowe Price is not responsible for the content of third party websites, including any performance data contained within them. Past performance cannot guarantee future results.