Skip to main content
Skip to content
Search

October 2021 / MULTI-ASSET SOLUTIONS

PULSe Indicator Rang the Alarm in Q3 2021

PULSe reached its highest level since April 2020.

Key Insights

  •  In Q3, the PULSe indicator increased in July and August due to deterioration in the Pandemic, the Liquidity, and the Sentiment factors. It reverted lower in September.
  •  The Pandemic factor rose to the crisis zone in August as the delta variant spread across major countries.
  •  The Sentiment factor oscillated between the crisis zone and the stable zone, driven by delta variant, inflation concerns, Fed discussions, and China’s regulatory crackdown.

PULSe is a composite indicator that is designed to monitor the state of global financial markets since the coronavirus crisis. It stands for Pandemic, Uncertainty, Liquidity, and Sentiment—four factors that we believe encompass much of the market’s dynamics. High positive values of PULSe are typically a negative sign for market stability.1

The PULSe composite indicator decreased modestly in September and was characterized as stable as of the end of the month as improvements in the Pandemic, the Uncertainty, and the Liquidity factors made up for the deterioration in the Sentiment factor. As of September 30, 2021:

  • The Pandemic factor abated as daily new cases continued to drop in the U.S., Europe, and Japan, which was confirmed by the reduced positive test ratios.
  • The Uncertainty factor declined notably as the Bloomberg U.S. economic surprise index bottomed, long‑term government bond yields rose, and earnings forecasts in Europe and Japan showed signs of reacceleration.
  • The Liquidity factor decreased modestly as competing forces canceled each other out: The widening trend of the spreads of U.S. three-month commercial paper and euro investment-grade financial corporate credit slowed down, while the U.S. high yield spread reversed higher again.
  • The Sentiment factor shot up as all four sub‑factors deteriorated: The equity put/call ratio rose, the implied volatility surged, carry currencies underperformed the safer currencies, and the gold/copper price ratio climbed.

Visualizing the PULSe Indicator

(Fig. 1) Expressed as an average of the four component indicators

Visualizing the PULSe Indicator

As of September 30, 2021.

Sources: Haver Analytics/Bloomberg Finance L.P. Analysis by T. Rowe Price.

For illustrative purposes only. Subject to change. The PULSe indicator has been developed by T. Rowe Price. Using different underlying indicators and data could yield different results. Future outcomes may differ significantly. Note: Positive indicator values are typically a negative sign for market stability. The division of PULSe into zones is subjective, based on historical data and statistical assumptions. “Trends” represent the change in the given indicator over the stated period. Please see additional disclosures on the PULSe indicator at the end of this paper.

Radar Chart Showing the PULSe Indicator and Its Components

(Fig. 2) Radial axes expressed as z‑scores (number of standard deviations from the mean)

Radar Chart Showing the PULSe Indicator and Its Components

As of September 30, 2021.

Sources: Haver Analytics/Bloomberg Finance L.P. Analysis by T. Rowe Price. 

For illustrative purposes only. Subject to change. The PULSe indicator has been developed by T. Rowe Price. Using different underlying indicators and data could yield different results. Future outcomes may differ significantly. “5 days,” “1 month,” and “3 months” represent the z‑score readings at those time periods prior to the current. Please see additional disclosures on the PULSe indicator at the end of this paper.

The Four Components of PULSe

(Fig. 3) Currently only Sentiment is elevated

The Four Components of PULSe

Sources: Haver Analytics/Bloomberg Finance L.P. Analysis by T. Rowe Price.

Indicator level on left‑hand side expressed as a z‑score and subjective stability zone on right‑hand side of each chart.

For illustrative purposes only. Subject to change. The PULSe indicator has been developed by T. Rowe Price. Using different underlying indicators and data could yield different results. Future outcomes may differ significantly. Note: Positive indicator values are typically a negative sign for market stability. The division of PULSe into zones is subjective, based on historical data and statistical assumptions. Please see additional disclosures on the PULSe indicator at the end of this paper.

Background Note

In this note, we highlight three factors that contributed meaningfully to the PULSe indicator over September, the last month of the third quarter. The delta variant wave abated in the U.S., long‑term government bond yields rose, and implied volatility surged.

1. The Delta Variant Is Abating in the U.S.

In the current Pandemic factor model, we look at three key metrics: (1) daily new cases to track the spread of COVID-19, (2) Positive testing ratios to confirm the trend of the diffusion curves, and (3) Google retail mobility data to assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on consumer behavior.

Starting from July, signs of overwhelmed hospitals in some regions of the U.S., which initially moved faster to vaccinate its population, suggested that vaccine efficacy may drop over time. As a result, Pfizer/BioNTech submitted trial data to the U.S. FDA seeking approval for booster shots for the general population and so far has received authorization for individuals over 65 years old and those 18 through 64 years of age at high risk of severe COVID‑19. We will wait and see what percentage of the population can be boosted ahead of the 2021 holiday season.

We Have Passed the Peak of the Delta Variant Wave, Confirmed by a Decreasing Positive Test Ratio

(Fig. 4) U.S. daily new cases and positive test ratio

We Have Passed the Peak of the Delta Variant Wave, Confirmed by a Decreasing Positive Test Ratio

As of September 30, 2021.

Sources: Haver Analytics/Bloomberg Finance L.P.

Soon after the positive test ratio peaked in late August, daily new cases started to drop rapidly, leading to a decline in the Pandemic factor score. Interestingly, during this round of outbreak, the Google retail mobility data have not been drastically impacted as people seemed to have adapted to the new norm of living with COVID‑19.

The Recent Virus Wave Didn’t Threaten Retail Mobility

(Fig. 5) U.S. daily new cases and Google retail mobility

The Recent Virus Wave Didn’t Threaten Retail Mobility

As of September 30, 2021.

Sources: Haver Analytics/Bloomberg Finance L.P.

On Friday, October 1, Merck and Ridgeback announced positive interim results for their orally administered COVID‑19 drug, molnupiravir. In the interim analysis, it reduced the risk of hospitalization by 50%. More encouragingly, through Day 29, no deaths were reported in patients who received the drug, as compared with eight deaths in patients who received a placebo.

Our medium‑term view is that COVID‑19 will be treated like a flu once enough of the global population gets vaccinated and receives regular booster shots or drugs. This should allow the cyclical part of the economy to fully recover and benefit from the excess spending reserves of businesses and consumers. However, this view has been delayed by the new delta variant. We still believe that the COVID‑off destination remains our base case, and getting there has only been delayed, not derailed.

2. Long-Term Government Bond Yields Rose

Our Uncertainty factor includes the 10‑year U.S. government bond yields to estimate changes in the market’s view of long‑term growth, inflation, and the term premium. Yields rise when investors see brighter economic prospects or expect higher inflation, and they drop when economic and market risks escalate.

In September, after the Federal Reserve’s two‑day policy meeting, policymakers announced that they would soon consider tapering the central bank’s purchases of Treasuries and mortgage‑backed securities. The Fed’s release of its quarterly survey of individual policymakers’ forecasts of future official short‑term interest rates showed a small increase in their median rate expectations, which some investors interpreted as a modestly hawkish signal. The coming wind‑down of the Fed’s monthly asset purchases and mildly hawkish revisions to its interest rate forecasts helped push the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield significantly higher. Our fixed income portfolio management team believes that reaccelerating economic growth, a stabilizing CPI, peaking liquidity, moderating regulatory crackdown, and abating coronavirus cases were all partially responsible for the recent movement in rates. Higher yields above all indicated lower economic uncertainty.

A Rise in Yields Indicates Brighter Economic Prospect

(Fig. 6) U.S. and Germany 10-year government bond yields

A Rise in Yields Indicates Brighter Economic Prospect

As of September 30, 2021.

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.

3. Implied Volatility Surged

The implied volatility of a market index derived from option prices reflects investors’ forecasts of the likely movement in security prices in that market, and it’s often thought to be a good proxy for market risk.

In early September, implied volatility surged, which could be largely attributed to the uncertainty of President Joe Biden’s spending plan and inflation worries. It was reported that Democratic Senator Joe Manchin backed as little as USD 1 trillion of Biden’s USD 3.5 trillion spending plan, highlighting the wide gap between Democrat moderates and progressives. According to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data release, there were a record 10.93 million positions waiting to be filled in July, putting upward pressure on wages, which will further challenge corporate profit margins.

In the week after, implied volatilities in the U.S. and Europe continued to push higher, likely due to contagion worries from China’s Evergrande and U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s op‑ed on debt ceiling risks. Our colleagues in the emerging markets credit team, Sheldon Chan and Anna Zhang, believe Evergrande’s troubles are unlikely to cause systematic risk in China, not to mention other parts of the world. Despite being the second‑largest property developer in China by contracted sales, it has only a 5% market share in the fragmented industry. Chan and Zhang expect that any impact to the banking system should be manageable and that the government will instead focus on the social fallout of unfinished housing units and payables to suppliers.

Implied volatility spiked again toward the end of the month, as investors anticipated the Federal Reserve moving away from the current highly accommodative policy and were concerned about the impact of rising Treasury yields on asset valuations. It appears we will continue to observe some volatility over the last three months of the year, driven by pandemic, Fed discussions, fiscal spending, energy prices, and regulatory crackdowns.

A Surge in Implied Volatility Indicates Deteriorating Market Sentiment

(Fig. 7) S&P 500 and Euro STOXX 50 implied volatility

A Surge in Implied Volatility Indicates Deteriorating Market Sentiment

As of September 30, 2021.

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources' accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.  

It is not intended for distribution retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Previous Article

16 October 2021 / VIDEO

Introducing the T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund
Next Article

November 2021 / MARKETS & ECONOMY

Banks Set to Play Critical Role in Climate Change Fight
202110-1885662