March 2021 / BLOG
Cooling U.S.-Europe Trade Tensions Could Lead to Bigger Deal
Biden likely to seek European support to exert pressure on China
The U.S. and European Union (EU) announced a four‑month suspension of all tariffs related to the long‑running dispute about unfair government support for leading aerospace companies Airbus and Boeing, signaling President Joe Biden’s desire to realign trade relations. This pause came on the heels of a similar agreement between the U.S. and the UK.
The timing of this early breakthrough may improve prospects of the Biden administration reaching a longer‑term agreement with the EU to resolve key trade challenges—such as taxation of mega‑cap U.S. internet companies’ international revenues and the steel and aluminum tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump’s administration.
Nevertheless, the process of fully restoring diplomatic and trade relationships with traditional U.S. allies likely will extend far beyond a single presidential term.
Tackling Transatlantic Trade Tensions
The tariff détente, which covers trade flows of roughly USD 12 billion, signals that both the U.S. and the EU are negotiating toward a resolution regarding the Airbus‑Boeing dispute over allegedly unfair government subsidies received by both companies. In addition to tariff relief for impacted industries, an agreement would provide aerospace companies with clarity regarding the appropriate funding mechanisms for aircraft development—a growing concern given China’s rapidly developing domestic capabilities in this area.
As 2021 progresses, the U.S. and Europe will be presented with further opportunities to address critical trade impasses, including a cross‑border digital tax advanced by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and reforms to World Trade Organization rules on industrial subsidies. Our base case calls for the OECD solution to involve a 2% to 3% levy on digital revenue in the jurisdiction in which it is generated. For mega‑cap U.S. tech companies, the regulation should prove manageable, with the increased costs likely passed through to local advertisers and merchants.
The Trump administration’s blanket tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum imports are likely to be reduced significantly or eliminated for traditional allies such as the EU, Japan, and South Korea in the second half of 2021.
Although the odds favor the U.S. and Europe resolving these trade issues by year‑end, much work remains to be done. Investors should be aware of the potential downside risks for mega‑cap U.S. internet companies, which could face a patchwork of cross‑border digital taxes if the OECD effort fails. Manufacturing industries would also suffer if tariffs remain in place or increase because of a trade conflict.
Still Tough on China, but Possibility of Limited Tariff Relief
We would expect America’s hawkish approach to China to continue. The Biden administration is more likely to seek European support to exert pressure on China to curtail anticompetitive behaviors and intellectual property issues, with an eye toward fortifying U.S. capabilities in various industries.
Although we would not expect the Biden administration to concede bargaining leverage associated with the wide‑ranging duties on Chinese products, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative could resume negotiations with Beijing in the second half of the year, creating the potential for some tariff relief. Any tariff eliminations would likely focus on consumer products, especially those subject to the lower 7.5% levy. However, if tensions flare over China’s actions in Taiwan or its treatment of the Uyghur population in Xinjiang, the likelihood of any tariff removals could diminish.
Investors should continue to monitor the evolution of the Biden administration’s approach to trade policy, which could have important implications for industrial companies, food and spirits industries, and the information technology sector.
This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.
The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.
Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources' accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.
It is not intend ed for distribution retail investors in any jurisdiction.
March 2021 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS
March 2021 / MARKETS & ECONOMY