Skip to content

March 2021 / MARKETS & ECONOMY

Has the Fed Turned Hawkish by Allowing Bond Yields to Surge?

It seems happy to let financial market conditions tighten.

Surging yields on U.S. government debt are tightening financial market conditions, but the response to this from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and his colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has been calm to the point of insouciance. Just last week, Powell triggered a sudden sell‑off in long‑term U.S. Treasury debt and equities when, in comments to a Wall Street Journal jobs summit, he expressed no concern about the sell‑off in bonds and provided no indication of policy changes ahead.

What has happened? Has Powell turned hawkish?

I don’t think so, but neither do I expect the FOMC to step in to calm the bond market with words or actions anytime soon. There are four reasons why I think this. 

...vaccine rollout and the significant fiscal support have led to a substantial improvement in the growth outlook.

First, vaccine rollout and the significant fiscal support have led to a substantial improvement in the growth outlook. Given the past nine months’ surge in demand for durable goods, the FOMC likely regards a marginal tightening of financial conditions as appropriate.

Second, to finance its substantial fiscal stimulus program, the U.S. Treasury has started to draw down its exceedingly large cash balance held at the Fed. Over the coming months, this will have much the same impact as around USD 1 trillion worth of quantitative easing. Combined with the stronger outlook for growth, we think that this leaves a high bar for the FOMC to become concerned about the tightening of financial conditions.

...the 2013 taper tantrum left a deep scar on the members of the FOMC...

Third, the 2013 taper tantrum left a deep scar on the members of the FOMC, and the committee remains extremely sensitive about triggering another tantrum when it—eventually—decides to adjust its policy. If the FOMC steps in to keep bond yields from reflecting the improvement in the growth outlook, it could create a valuation bubble in the bond market—sharply increasing the risk of a Fed‑induced taper tantrum later. Surely it seems better to let the bond market adjust early.

Fourth, until now, the Fed has managed the coronavirus crisis in much the same way as it did the global financial crisis. However, there are fundamental differences between the two situations. The global financial crisis was a banking crisis that kicked off a decadelong deleveraging process for U.S. households and required monetary policy support to be maintained for an extraordinarily long period. The shock from the coronavirus pandemic has been deep, but it is likely to be much shorter‑lived because the U.S. economy went into it without major imbalances in need of a recessionary purge. As we roll out vaccines, the Fed is beginning to adjust to this reality.

One final thought: Given that growth is accelerating and the U.S. Treasury is about to inject an enormous amount of money into the economy via its stimulus plan, maybe this is actually quite a good time for the Fed to let bond yields adjust higher. Financial conditions and risk markets should remain well supported by these factors, making a disorderly sell‑off less likely. Of course, should the adjustment turn disorderly, Powell and company stand ready with soothing words and—most likely—policy action, should it be required.


This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Previous Article


Investing in the Infrastructure Behind the Digital Economy
Next Article

March 2021 / VIDEO

Why Now for EM Local Currency Debt?

February 2021 / MARKETS & ECONOMY

The Risk Rally Will Likely Continue, but It Is Vulnerable

The Risk Rally Will Likely Continue, but It Is Vulnerable

The Risk Rally Will Likely Continue, but...

A price correction is possible

By Nikolaj Schmidt

Nikolaj Schmidt Chief Global Economist

December 2020 / MARKETS & ECONOMY

Market Optimism May Be Justified—But I Urge Caution

Market Optimism May Be Justified—But I Urge Caution

Market Optimism May Be Justified—But I Urge...

Weak growth and a fiscally hamstrung U.S. signal trouble ahead

By Nikolaj Schmidt

Nikolaj Schmidt Chief Global Economist