Managing the Unmanageable: A Framework for Navigating Market Drawdowns in Fixed Income

Executive Summary

Drawdowns are an unavoidable feature of investing. While significant resources are dedicated to anticipating them, the reality is that consistently positioning portfolios ahead of market stress is extremely difficult. Outcomes are shaped not only by insight, but by timing, path dependency, and elements of randomness that limit the reliability of ex-ante positioning.
At the same time, maintaining constant defensive positioning can introduce a structural drag on performance. Over a full market cycle, the cumulative cost of hedging often outweighs the benefits realized during periods of stress.
This paper argues for a different approach. Rather than attempting to avoid drawdowns, successful investing should focus on diagnosing and responding to them appropriately. Crucially, not all drawdowns are the same—and treating them as such is costly.

The Myth of Perfect Positioning

The idea that investors can consistently position portfolios correctly ahead of drawdowns is deeply ingrained—but ultimately unrealistic. While it is possible to identify conditions that make markets more vulnerable—such as stretched valuations, crowded positioning, or fragile liquidity—these signals do not provide clarity on the timing or catalyst of a drawdown.

Predicting what will trigger a market correction, and when it will occur, remains inherently difficult. Even when risks are correctly identified, waiting for a catalyst can itself become costly, as markets can remain resilient for extended periods. This creates a structural challenge: positioning too early can erode returns, while positioning too late offers limited risk mitigation or is significantly more expensive.

Perhaps most importantly, anticipating a risk does not guarantee an accurate understanding of how markets will respond. Developments in 2022 provide a useful example. Inflation risks were widely recognized, yet the magnitude, speed, and persistence of the rate adjustment caught many investors off guard. Markets repriced aggressively, with policy rates rising sharply and bond yields moving significantly higher. Even portfolios aligned with the broad macro narrative experienced material losses, as positioning failed to fully reflect the scale and transmission of the shock.

The key takeaway is that the challenge is not simply identifying risks—it is translating those risks into effective positioning under uncertainty.

The Cost of Maintaining Downside Hedges

In response to the difficulty of timing drawdowns, some investors adopt a strategy of maintaining continuous hedging positions. While this may provide a degree of comfort, it comes at a measurable and often underappreciated cost.

Delta-one hedging strategies, such as maintaining short credit exposure through indices, introduce a persistent drag on portfolio carry. In stable or risk-positive environments, this could meaningfully reduce income and lead to consistent underperformance. Over time, these small but continuous costs compound, eroding long-term returns.

Options-based approaches offers a different profile, providing convexity in periods of stress. However, this comes with a higher explicit cost, as option premiums decay over time. While certain structures—such as spreads or collars—can reduce upfront costs, they do so by limiting the scope or timing of that downside benefit. In practice, there is no costless hedge: reducing premium outlay typically means sacrificing coverage in specific scenarios or accepting narrower payoff profiles.

The implication is not that hedging lacks value. Rather, its effectiveness is highly context-dependent, and maintaining it continuously is inefficient. These types of strategies can be valuable in periods of acute stress, but persistently paying for it can materially detract from long-term outcomes.

A Framework for Understanding Drawdowns

A more effective approach begins with recognizing that drawdowns differ in their underlying drivers and market dynamics.

At the highest level, drawdowns can be divided into fundamental and technical events. Fundamental drawdowns are typically driven by changes in economic conditions and are often accompanied by, among other macroeconomic factors, a deterioration in earnings expectations over the subsequent 6–12 months. Technical drawdowns, by contrast, are driven by flows, positioning, and liquidity dynamics, with little or no change in underlying fundamentals.

A further distinction can be made based on the speed and severity of the drawdown. Rapid drawdowns are characterized by sharp declines—typically exceeding 7–8% and reaching a bottom within a relatively short time frame—while slower drawdowns unfold more gradually and over longer periods.

Figure 1: Major Market Drawdowns and Volatility Since 2000

Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. Data as of 30 April 2026. Analysis by T. Rowe Price

Applying this framework to recent history provides useful insight. The inflation shock of 2022 represents a fundamental, slow-moving drawdown, driven by persistent macro repricing. The COVID-19 crisis was a fundamental but sharp drawdown, marked by a rapid deterioration in economic activity and a sharp repricing of risk. By contrast, the dislocation in August 2024, sparked by a Bank of Japan interest rate hike which shook carry trades linked to the low yielding Japanese yen, is best understood as a technical and rapid drawdown, driven by positioning and liquidity rather than changes in fundamentals.

Market Behaviour and Recovery Dynamics

The differences between these drawdowns are most evident in how markets behave during and after the event.

In 2022, losses accumulated gradually and recovery has been prolonged, reflecting persistent macro uncertainty and the drawdown’s less abrupt nature. During COVID-19, the sharp drawdown saw markets reprice rapidly but recover within months as policy support restored confidence. In August 2024, the dislocation was brief but severe, with spreads widening quickly before normalizing just as fast.

These patterns highlight a key asymmetry: technical drawdowns have tended to reverse quickly, while fundamental ones persisted. This distinction has direct implications for how investors should respond. It is also important to understand the ability and resolve of policy makers to respond in a fundamental drawdown. Very simply, policymakers can be quicker to spend than enact austerity measures.

Increased Frequency of Technical Drawdowns

The increased frequency of technical drawdowns over the past decade reflects structural changes in market dynamics rather than larger underlying shocks. A greater share of trading is now driven by systematic strategies and passive vehicles, which react mechanically to price and volatility, creating self-reinforcing moves.

At the same time, reduced dealer balance sheets have diminished the market’s ability to absorb flows, while liquidity—particularly in fixed income—has become more fragile.

The growth of leverage and faster, algorithm-driven execution as well as greater homogeneity of investors further amplify these effects, compressing market adjustments into shorter, more severe episodes. As a result, markets have become more efficient in stable conditions but less resilient in periods of stress, increasing the likelihood of sharp, flow-driven dislocations.

Diagnosing the Drawdown in Real Time

Distinguishing between drawdown types in real time is challenging but essential. The key is to assess whether market moves are being driven by changes in economic fundamentals or by flows and positioning.

We frame this through the “4Ps” diagnostic framework:

Figure 2: Distinguishing Types of Sell-Offs

Key Framework for understanding market drawdowns

Source: T. Rowe Price. For illustrative purposes only

In 2022, the signal was consistent and cumulative—rising inflation, tightening policy, weakening fundamentals and a clear repricing of rates. During COVID-19, the collapse in economic activity and earnings expectations provided a clear fundamental catalyst. In contrast, the August 2024 dislocation was characterized by rapid price moves, limited macro deterioration, and clear signs of liquidity stress and forced selling.

The guiding question remains simple: Is this a change in fundamentals, or a market dislocation?

Response Matters More Than Just Positioning

Once the nature of the drawdown is understood, the effectiveness of the response becomes the primary driver of outcomes.

A common mistake in volatile markets is to chase downside risk mitigation after the initial move has occurred. In highly illiquid conditions, this often results in paying elevated prices for hedges that deliver limited benefit, particularly if the market stabilizes quickly. In many cases, this can lead to both higher costs and weaker overall outcomes.

The effectiveness of hedging varies significantly across different environments, particularly in fast-moving markets.

In highly volatile and technically driven market environments, the timing of hedging becomes critically important. Without near-perfect execution, the cost of downside mitigation can outweigh its benefits—particularly in scenarios where markets recover rapidly or where drawdowns remain relatively shallow.

The recent Iranian conflict provides a useful illustration. For example, comparing the performance of the S&P 500 Index with the CBOE S&P 500 5% Put Protection Index shows that, during this specific period of elevated volatility, the S&P 500 Index outperformed. In this case, the cost of maintaining the options-based hedge exceeded the downside risk mitigation provided during the short-lived market dislocation.

Figure 3: Performance Comparison of a Hedged Equity index and the S&P 500 Index During Iranian Conflict

Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
This is an illustrative, index-based comparison and does not represent actual portfolio performance or the experience of any investor.Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. Data as of 30/04/2026, Analysis by T. Rowe Price.

In fundamental drawdowns, where either the magnitude of the decline or the time taken to reach the trough becomes more significant,hedging can become more effective. During COVID-19, the severity of the drawdown made hedging particularly effective, while in2022, hedging over specific periods would also have been additive, as illustrated below.

Figure 4: Performance Comparison of a Hedged Equity index and the S&P 500 index During COVID-19

Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
This is an illustrative, index-based comparison and does not represent actual portfolio performance or the experience of any investor.
Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. Data Comparison between 03/02/2020 to 29/06/2020, Analysis by T. Rowe Price.

Figure 5: Performance Comparison of a Hedged Equity Index and the S&P 500 Index During 2022

Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
This is an illustrative, index-based comparison and does not represent actual portfolio performance or the experience of any investor.
Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. Data comparison between 01/02/2022 to 30/12/2022, Analysis by T. Rowe Price.

While the initial shock may be unavoidable, a more effective response is often to focus on price dislocations and act as a provider of liquidity rather than a consumer of it.

In a slow, fundamental drawdown such as 2022, this involves gradual repositioning—reducing exposure to duration while rebuilding yield at higher levels. In a severe, fundamental shock like COVID-19, portfolios may benefit from a combination of defensive positioning in government bonds and opportunistic buying as spreads overshoot as well as direct hedging.

In technical dislocations, the approach differs. Because these episodes are driven by liquidity rather than fundamentals, hedging is often both expensive and ineffective. The more attractive opportunity lies in selectively deploying capital into assets that have become temporarily dislocated from their intrinsic value. This is where mandate flexibility is important and why we stress liquidity and the ability to enter markets that are out of reach for retail investors or outside of traditional institutional mandates.

Being early to these calls before it is obvious to the entire market can create value.

Figure 6: Different Drawdowns Require Different Responses

Source: T. Rowe Price. For illustrative purposes only

Conclusion: Redefining responses to market drawdowns in Fixed Income

Recent market history reinforces a simple conclusion. Drawdowns are inevitable, and the ability to consistently avoid them is limited. Attempts to do so often introduce costs that erode long-term performance.

A more robust definition of market drawdowns encourages portfolio adaptability. It requires the ability to distinguish between different types of drawdowns, interpret market signals in real time, and respond with the appropriate toolkit.

The inflation shock of 2022, the COVID-19 crisis, and the technical dislocation of August 2024 each rewarded different behaviors. What they share is a common lesson: outcomes are determined not by the avoidance of drawdowns, but by the discipline and flexibility of the response.

In fixed income, the edge is not prediction—it is disciplined adaptation.

Adam Marden Portfolio Manager

Scott Solomon, CFA Portfolio Manager

Jun 2026 On the Horizon Article

Manufacturing revival complicates inflation fight

Markets may be underestimating longer-term inflation risks.

By Adam Marden

May 2026 From the Field Article

Bond markets and the new inflation reality

How to position for a prolonged energy shock.

By Peter Botoucharov

Additional Disclosures

T. Rowe Price cautions that economic estimates and forward looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual outcomes could differ materially from those anticipated in estimates and forward looking statements, and future results could differ materially from historical performance. The information presented herein is shown for illustrative, informational purposes only. Any historical data used as a basis for analysis are based on information gathered by T. Rowe Price and from third party sources and have not been verified. Forecasts are based on subjective estimates about market environments that may never occur. Any forward looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. T. Rowe Price assumes no duty to, and does not undertake to, update forward looking statements.

Investment Risks

Fixed income securities are subject to credit risk, liquidity risk, call risk, and interest rate risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices generally fall. Investments in high yield bonds involve greater risk of price volatility, illiquidity, and default than higher rated debt securities.Investments in bank loans may at times become difficult to value and highly illiquid; they are subject to credit risk such as nonpayment of principal or interest, and risks of bankruptcy and insolvency.

Additional Disclosures

For U.S. investors, visit troweprice.com/glossary for definitions of financial terms.

Please see vendor indices for more information, including definitions and source data: troweprice.com/marketdata.

Important Information

This material is being furnished for general informational purposes and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction. Not all vehicles are available in the different jurisdictions.

Australia—Issued by T. Rowe Price Australia Limited (ABN: 13 620 668 895 and AFSL: 503741), Level 28, Governor Phillip Tower, 1 Farrer Place, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia. For Wholesale Clients only.

Brunei—This material can only be delivered to certain specific institutional investors for informational purpose only. Any strategy and/or any products associated with the strategy discussed herein has not been authorised for distribution in Brunei. No distribution of this material to any member of the public in Brunei is permitted.

Canada—Issued in Canada by T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc.’s investment management services are only available to non individual Accredited Investors and non individual Permitted Clients as defined under National Instrument 45 106 and National Instrument 31 103, respectively. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. enters into written delegation agreements with affiliates to provide investment management services.

Colombia, Chile, Mexico, Perù, Uruguay—This material is prepared by T. Rowe Price International Ltd Warwick Court, 5 Paternoster Square, London, EC4M 7DX which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and issued and distributed by locally authorized distributors only. For professional investors only.

DIFC—Issued in the Dubai International Financial Centre by T. Rowe Price International Ltd which is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority as a Representative Office. For Professional Clients only.

EEA—Unless indicated otherwise this material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price (Luxembourg) Management S.à r.l. 35 Boulevard du Prince Henri L 1724 Luxembourg which is authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. For Professional Clients only.

Hong Kong—Issued in Hong Kong by T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Limited, 6/F, Chater House, 8 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong. T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Limited is licensed and regulated by the Securities & Futures Commission. For Professional Investors only.

Indonesia—This material is intended to be used only by the designated recipient to whom T. Rowe Price delivered; it is for institutional use only. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied, redistributed or shared, in any medium, without prior written consent from T. Rowe Price. No distribution of this material to members of the public in any jurisdiction is permitted. South Korea—This material is intended only to Qualified Professional Investors. Not for further distribution.

Mainland China—This material is provided to qualified investors only. No invitation to offer, or offer for, or sale of, the shares will be made in the mainland of the People’s Republic of China (“Mainland China”, not including the Hong Kong or Macau Special Administrative Regions or Taiwan) or by any means that would be deemed public under the laws of the Mainland China. The information relating to the strategy contained in this material has not been submitted to or approved by the China Securities Regulatory Commission or any other relevant governmental authority in the Mainland China. The strategy and/or any product associated with the strategy may only be offered or sold to investors in the Mainland China that are expressly authorized under the laws and regulations of the Mainland China to buy and sell securities denominated in a currency other than the Renminbi (or RMB), which is the official currency of the Mainland China. Potential investors who are resident in the Mainland China are responsible for obtaining the required approvals from all relevant government authorities in the Mainland China, including, but not limited to, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, before purchasing the shares. This document further does not constitute any securities or investment advice to citizens of the Mainland China, or nationals with permanent residence in the Mainland China, or to any corporation, partnership, or other entity incorporated or established in the Mainland China.

Malaysia—This material can only be delivered to specific institutional investor. This material is solely for institutional use and for informational purposes only. This material does not provide investment advice or an offering to make, or an inducement or attempted inducement of any person to enter into or to offer to enter into, an agreement for or with a view to acquiring, disposing of, subscribing for or underwriting securities. Nothing in this material shall be considered a making available of, solicitation to buy, an offering for subscription or purchase or an invitation to subscribe for or purchase any securities, or any other product or service, to any person in any jurisdiction where such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the laws of Malaysia.

New Zealand—Issued by T. Rowe Price Australia Limited (ABN: 13 620 668 895 and AFSL: 503741), Level 28, Governor Phillip Tower, 1 Farrer Place, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia. No Interests are offered to the public. Accordingly, the Interests may not, directly or indirectly, be offered, sold or delivered in New Zealand, nor may any offering document or advertisement in relation to any offer of the Interests be distributed in New Zealand, other than in circumstances where there is no contravention of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

Philippines—ANY STRATEGY AND/ OR ANY SECURITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STRATEGY BEING DISCUSSED HEREIN HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE. ANY FUTURE OFFER OR SALE OF THE STRATEGY AND/ OR ANY SECURITIES IS SUBJECT TO REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CODE, UNLESS SUCH OFFER OR SALE QUALIFIES AS AN EXEMPT TRANSACTION.

Singapore—Issued by T. Rowe Price Singapore Private Ltd. (UEN: 201021137E), 501 Orchard Rd, #10 02 Wheelock Place, Singapore 238880. T. Rowe Price Singapore Private Ltd. is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. For Institutional and Accredited Investors only.

South Africa—Issued in South Africa by T. Rowe Price International Ltd (TRPIL), Warwick Court, 5 Paternoster Square, London EC4M 7DX, is an authorised financial services provider under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002 (Financial Services Provider (FSP) Licence Number 31935), authorised to provide “intermediary services” to South African Investors. TRPIL’s Complaint Handling Procedures are available to clients upon request. The Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act Ombud in South Africa deals with complaints from clients against FSPs in relation to the specific services rendered by FSPs. The contact details are noted below: Telephone: +27 12 762 5000, Web: www.faisombud.co.za, Email: info@faisombud.co.za

Switzerland—Issued in Switzerland by T. Rowe Price (Switzerland) GmbH, Talstrasse 65, 6th Floor, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland. For Qualified Investors only.

Taiwan—This does not provide investment advice or recommendations. Nothing in this material shall be considered a solicitation to buy, or an offer to sell, a security, or any other product or service, to any person in the Republic of China.

Thailand—This material has not been and will not be filed with or approved by the Securities Exchange Commission of Thailand or any other regulatory authority in Thailand. The material is provided solely to “institutional investors” as defined under relevant Thai laws and regulations. No distribution of this material to any member of the public in Thailand is permitted. Nothing in this material shall be considered a provision of service, or a solicitation to buy, or an offer to sell, a security, or any other product or service, to any person where such provision, offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under relevant Thai laws and regulations.

UK—This material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price International Ltd, Warwick Court, 5 Paternoster Square, London EC4M 7DX which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. For Professional Clients only.

USA—Issued in the USA by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., 1307 Point Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, which is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. For institutional investors only.

© 2026 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. Rowe Price, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, the Bighorn Sheep design, and related indicators (see troweprice.com/ip) are trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Use does not imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation of T. Rowe Price with any of the trademark owners.

202605-5477780 T. Rowe Price identifies and actively invests in opportunities to help people thrive in an evolving world, bringing our dynamic perspec