Fixed Income

Signs Point to Slowing Capex

May 3, 2019
We anticipate decelerating capex among investment‑grade corporate issuers.

Key Points

  • We do not expect capital expenditure growth in investment-grade corporates to boost broader U.S. economic growth.
  • Capital spending in commodity-related sectors is particularly susceptible to slowing, which, along with better productivity, is positive for credit quality.
  • We favor shorter-maturity debt and are overweight the energy sector within the investment-grade corporate bond asset class.

Several trends among issuers of investment‑grade corporate debt, including decelerating growth in EBITDA1 and increasing prioritization of share buybacks, lead us to expect capital expenditures (capex) in the asset class to slow. As a result, capex among investment‑grade companies is unlikely to provide meaningful support to economic expansion. Our outlook for decelerating capex growth contributes to our defensive positioning in the asset class, where we favor shorter‑maturity debt to reduce exposure to potentially deteriorating credit quality.

Capex Strongly Correlated With EBITDA

Investment‑grade corporate capex growth is strongly correlated (R2=0.82) with EBITDA growth on a two‑quarter lag.2 Year‑over‑year EBITDA growth has been slightly decelerating since the second quarter of 2018. While year‑over‑year capex growth has been accelerating modestly, we expect capex to follow EBITDA by downshifting to a flat or declining pace later in 2019.

Industries Related to Commodities Drive Capex

Commodity‑related industries, including energy and metals and mining, account for 32% of capex within investment‑grade corporates, so these sectors drive capex trends within the broad asset class. Also, commodity‑related sectors tend to be more volatile, so they also have a disproportionately large effect on the rate of change for investment‑grade corporate capex. Earnings growth in these industries has been slowing, which contributes to our outlook for decelerating capex.

32%
Percent of capex within investment‑grade corporates that commodity‑related industries account for.

In addition, T. Rowe Price’s metals and mining and energy credit analysts point out that productivity improvements in these sectors has allowed companies to achieve similar growth with lower capital spending. As a result, we hold overweights to energy‑related issuers in our investment‑grade corporate portfolios as the combination of productivity improvements and improved capital discipline is positive for credit quality.

Shareholder‑Friendly Actions Back in Vogue

Our credit analysts covering investment‑grade issuers also note that companies have been prioritizing share buybacks and dividend increases—shareholder‑friendly actions—over capex following the implementation of U.S. tax reform at the beginning of 2018. While we see no immediate catalyst for this trend to turn in favor of capex, shareholder payouts have historically been more volatile than capex, rising more quickly during periods of growth and falling more rapidly in contractions. Corporate management teams tend to use stock buybacks as a discretionary tool to support equity prices, contributing to the volatility of these actions.

Corporate management teams tend to use stock buybacks as a discretionary tool to support equity prices, contributing to the volatility of these actions.

Investment‑Grade Corporate Capex Unlikely to Support Economy

All of these trends indicate that capex growth in investment‑grade corporates is likely to flatten out or gradually decelerate in the latter part of 2019. Because business investment is a key component of gross domestic product (GDP), capex ultimately can lead to higher GDP. However, based on our analysis of the investment‑grade corporate asset class, capex is unlikely to accelerate, so we believe it is doubtful that an increase in business investment will contribute a meaningful boost to GDP.

Favor Shorter Maturities, Energy Issuers

In terms of the positioning of our investment‑grade corporate bond portfolios, this outlook for decelerating capex is a factor in our overall defensive stance. The pickup in shareholder‑friendly corporate actions that has come at the expense of capex has limited improvements in credit quality, with leverage remaining elevated in the asset class. We broadly favor shorter‑maturity positions that reduce our exposure to the deteriorating credit quality that is common in the later stages of the economic cycle.

At the industry level, we favor the energy sector because of its improved corporate efficiency and capital discipline. At the individual security level, our credit analysts incorporate their knowledge of corporate management’s tendencies toward spending on stock buybacks or dividends versus capex into their credit quality profiles.

We broadly favor shorter‑maturity positions that reduce our exposure to the deteriorating credit quality that is common in the later stages of the economic cycle.

WHAT WE’RE WATCHING NEXT

If the trend continues, the sharp upturn in the prices of oil and other commodities in the first quarter of 2019 could affect both productivity and capital spending at investment‑grade companies in the energy and metals and mining industries. T. Rowe Price’s energy analysts believe that further gains for oil are possible in the shorter term, but productivity improvements at U.S. shale oil producers are likely to boost supply and push prices down in the longer term.

1Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
2R2 measures the degree of correlation in regression analysis, with 1 indicating perfect correlation and 0 indicating no correlation.

Important Information

This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investment advice or a recommendation to take any particular investment action.

The views contained herein are those of the authors as of May 2019 and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price associates.

This information is not intended to reflect a current or past recommendation, investment advice of any kind, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or investment services. The opinions and commentary provided do not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular investor or class of investor. Investors will need to consider their own circumstances before making an investment decision.

Information contained herein is based upon sources we consider to be reliable; we do not, however, guarantee its accuracy.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All investments are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.

201905‑832192

Next Steps: