Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:


Share Class: Language of the document:

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the twenty four-year period ended June 30, 2020, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest

Please enter valid search characters

Retirement Insights

What DC Plan Sponsors Prefer Retiring Participants Do and Why It Matters

Postretirement thinking should inform plan sponsor decisions.

Executive Summary

  • According to T. Rowe Price research, only 17.8% of DC plan sponsors prefer participants to leave their plans at retirement. This raises the question: Should we consider the implications of longer-term involvement with participants after they retire?
  • Keeping retired participants in DC plans is more than an academic question. On average, retired participants made up 14.3% of plan populations within our survey pool.
  • There is strong agreement among plan sponsors on the benefits of taking a longer-term view—including periods up to and through retirement. Notably, this agreement persists, even among those preferring that participants leave their plans at retirement.
  • Considering participants’ long-term retirement journey also adds important context for making plan decisions, including communications strategies, availability of plan distribution options, and qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) selection.

In T. Rowe Price research on plan sponsors’ understanding of risk and long-term objectives conducted in 2018,1 we found that a strong majority of plan sponsors prioritized keeping retiring participants in their plan. This perspective contrasts with a conventional view that a plan sponsor’s responsibility predominantly extends to the point of the participant’s retirement. However, greater interest in retaining retired participants in plan seems to be a rapidly developing trend among plan sponsors. After all, assessment of in-plan retirement income solutions—and, presumably, keeping participants who would use them—has been extensively discussed within the DC industry. In particular, the strength of plan sponsors’ preference for retaining retired participants in plan presented a compelling opportunity for further study.

The current research profiled in this report provides a more complete understanding of what’s driving plan sponsor preferences concerning what participants do with their DC plan balances at retirement. Deeper exploration of these issues can also help us understand the broader influence of postretirement thinking. Increasingly, DC plan design and oversight is influenced by an objectives-based approach. Given that orientation, rising concern for what happens after a participant retires should reframe plan objectives and targeted outcomes. 

(Fig. 1) All Respondents
Q: When your employees retire, what would your organization prefer that they do
with their DC plan balances?2

This research provides basic data to help plan sponsors understand where they stand versus peers on retaining retiring participants. It can also help investment consultants, plan service providers, and asset managers better calibrate the evolution of plan design, investment solutions, and communications strategies.

Beyond plan features and solutions that directly address the needs of retiring participants, changing attitudes and objectives can more broadly influence other plan decisions. This includes communications with participants as they approach retirement age and the evaluation and selection of plan QDIAs. 

Opening Quote ...rising concern for what happens after a participant retires should reframe plan objectives and targeted outcomes. Closing Quote

A Plurality of Plan Sponsors Prefer Participants Keep Their DC Plan Balances in Plan When They Retire

More than 39% of plan sponsors prefer that participants keep their DC assets in plan after retirement. Only 17.8% of plan sponsors preferred that participants exit the plan upon retirement (e.g., rolling over balances to an IRA, taking a lumpsum distribution, etc.).

Further, 5.8% of plan sponsors reported that they were reconsidering their position regarding retention of retiring participants, signaling that the positions of some plan sponsors are in flux. More interestingly, a large segment of plan sponsors reported “no clear preference” (37.2%) on the issue. This should not necessarily be interpreted as simple indifference in all cases. Many plan sponsors seem open to both options—support for participants who choose to exit the plan as well as for participants to remain in their DC plans. The views of plan sponsors in this group may skew more to principled neutrality rather than simple ambivalence.

Overall, these findings may reflect an evolution of thought among plan sponsors. Rather than simply focusing on the needs of current employees, many plan sponsors appear increasingly open to supporting the needs of participants over longer time frames, including periods after retirement. 

(Fig. 2) Responses Based on Reported Plan Assets, >$500M and <$500M
Q: When your employees retire, what would your organization prefer that they do with their DC plan balances?

Sponsors of Larger Plans Are More Likely to Prefer Participants Stay in the DC Plan After Retirement

Our data demonstrate a clear discrepancy between the retention preferences of sponsors of larger plans (assets of $500M or greater) and sponsors of smaller plans (assets less than $500M). Sponsors of larger plans are much more likely to favor retaining retiring participants in plan. Plan size—in and of itself—is probably not the direct cause. Smaller employers may simply be more concerned about their ability to provide administrative support for relatively large pools of retired participants over time.

The preferences of larger plan sponsors can have a more deterministic effect on DC plan service providers and asset managers, driving product and feature development that can downstream to smaller plans. The broad effect on the DC marketplace may be increased availability of more effective and efficient features, solutions, and resources intended for retired participants in the future. 

Opening Quote Even plan sponsors who prefer participants to leave the DC plan at retirement often acknowledged that their DC plan can provide advantages. Closing Quote

“They’re Here…”: Retired Participants Are Already a Reality in Many DC Plans

Plan sponsor preferences aside, a substantial percentage of the plan participant base may already be retired in many plans. Plan sponsors typically only force a participant out via mandatory distribution upon termination of employment if the account balance is less than $5,000.5 In reality, nearly all plans will carry a population of former employees (retired or otherwise).

However, the percentage of retired participants (14.3% average) reported within our research sample suggests that some are inclined to remain within the DC plan beyond a short transitional period after separating from service. Separate research from T. Rowe Price on a more expansive sample of DC plan participants adds broader context. Forty-five percent of DC plan participants who separated from service (retired or otherwise) left balances in a prior employer’s plan or consolidated it within the plan of a new employer; only 38% elected to roll over DC plan balances to an IRA.6 In other words, participants more often chose to keep accumulated balances within the DC system than not. 

Although the number of retired participants will vary by plan, it’s often incorrect to assume all participants will leave the plan when they retire. With a significant number of retirees remaining in their DC plans, plan sponsors who have not yet considered how to address their needs should ask themselves: Is this a sustainable and justifiable approach, or is it better to consider the possibility of longer-term involvement? 

(Fig. 3) Portion of Participants Who Are Already Retired7
Average Values by Plan Sponsor Retention Preference

Plan Sponsors Are Confident Their DC Plans Can Offer Advantages for Retiring Participants

An individual participant’s decision to stay in plan or roll over assets to an IRA can be complicated and based on several factors. However, there are two common reasons why remaining within a DC plan may be appealing.

First, the large scale of DC plans offers the advantage of institutional pricing and potentially lower overall investment costs compared with an IRA. Second, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requires the application of rigorous standards and oversight within DC plans under its jurisdiction, whereas an individual may or may not receive this same standard of care outside of the plan. 

(Fig. 4) Participants are usually better off keeping DC plan balances because of… 

What DC Plan Sponsors Prefer Retiring Participants Do and Why It Matters

What DC Plan Sponsors Prefer Retiring Participants Do and Why It Matters
What DC Plan Sponsors Prefer Retiring Participants Do and Why It Matters

1 Previous pulse survey conducted by P&I Content Solutions Group and statistical analysis conducted by Signet Research Inc. in early 2018. Survey populationincludes 289 corporate, non-profit, and government plan sponsors with assets: 49% less than $500M, 15% between $500M and $1B, 32% between $1B and$15 B, and 4% more than $15B.
2 Results from 191 respondents.
3 Results from 88 respondents.
4 Results from 102 respondents.
5 Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code § 401(a)(31)(B)(ii).
6 RSS4 © 2018 NMG Consulting. All rights reserved. T. Rowe Price engaged NMG Consulting to conduct a national study of 3,005 adults age 21 and older who have never retired and are currently contributing to a 401(k) plan or are eligible to contribute and have a balance of at least $1,000. We also included an oversample of 1,005 adults who have retired with a rollover IRA or left-in-plan 401(k) balance.
7 For “Among all plan sponsors,” results from 165 respondents. For “Among sponsors who prefer participants retain their DC balances,” results from 65 respondents. For “Among sponsors who prefer participants move their DC balances,” results from 29 respondents. For “Among sponsors who have no clear preference or are reconsidering,” results from 63 respondents.
8 Results from 188 respondents.

Important Information

This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.

It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass.

The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price. 

This material was prepared for use in the United States for U.S.-based plan sponsors, consultants, and advisors, and the material reflects the current retirement environment in the U.S. It is also available to Canada-based plan sponsors, consultants and advisors for reference. There are many differences between the two nations’ retirement plan offerings and structures. Therefore, from a Canadian perspective, this material is offered for educational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or offer of any product or service. 

USA—Issued in the USA by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD, 21202, which are regulated by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, respectively. For Institutional Investors only. 

© 2021 T. Rowe Price. All rights reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the bighorn sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks or registered trademarks, of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.