- The cocktail of economic and political ingredients across many frontier markets is reminiscent of emerging markets of the late ’90s, suggesting that a long period of positive growth can ensue.
- Peace, improving politics, and a focus on economic management are attracting the investment necessary to help unlock frontier countries’ potential.
- With better economic backdrops comes capacity for well-run companies to potentially achieve higher levels of earnings growth.
- Over the past five years, frontier markets have provided better risk-adjusted returns than many other equity groups, including both developed and emerging markets.
- While volatility is to be expected, low correlations between frontier and global markets and extremely low intramarket correlations are strong arguments for an allocation to frontier markets.
THE PATH TO TRANSFORMATION— PEACE, POLITICS, INVESTMENT, AND GROWTH
When T. Rowe Price launched the Frontier Markets Equity Strategy in June 2014, we noted that many characteristics of the frontier countries were reminiscent of the emerging markets of the late ’90s—state of democracy, levels of investment, demographics, rising urbanization, nominal GDP levels, GDP per capita, and very low market capitalization (Figure 1). As we see improvements in these political and economic indicators, we should expect frontier markets to grow significantly in terms of market representation.
Starting with peace: Looking back to the mid-90s, there were close to 50 separate major conflicts going on between and in frontier markets (e.g., Sri Lanka’s civil war and conflict in the Niger Delta). That number has significantly reduced as of today, and the ending of these major conflicts has provided a foundation for political improvements. In many of the frontier countries, we have seen an embracing of the democratic process and several examples of peaceful handovers to political oppositions (e.g., Nigeria, Argentina, Sri Lanka, and Georgia). Notably, Pakistan’s government served its first full term without a coup in almost 70 years. The democratic process encourages governments to focus on economic improvements with the motivation of getting reelected and has led to completion of IMF programs, capital market liberalizations, and policies to attract investment.
FIGURE 1: Frontier Markets’ Growth Potential Is Similar to That of Emerging Markets in the Late ‘90s
Nominal GDP (USD Trillions)
As of December 31, 2016
Total Market Cap (USD Trillions)
As of December 31, 2016
* Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates
** Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Ghana, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lithuania, Mauritius, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Ukraine, Vietnam, Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia
Vietnam is one such case, where levels of foreign direct investment (FDI) have been rising year-on-year, with its booming electronics market attracting the lion’s share of inflows as the country becomes a global manufacturing hub (Figure 2). Meanwhile, Argentina is playing catch-up as Mauricio Macri’s administration continues to enact market-friendly reform, which has won praise and renewed the confidence of international investors.
FIGURE 2: Countries Like Vietnam Are Attracting Huge Levels of FDI
FDI inflows (USD millions, rolling 4Q) as of December 31, 2016
Source: World Bank and Haver Analytics
Many frontier countries also have debt and inflation under control. The combination is a powerful driver for growth, with frontier markets consisting of some of the fastest-growing economies globally. The group as a whole is expected to outpace emerging markets and significantly outpace developed markets in terms of GDP growth throughout the rest of this decade and likely beyond.
Our belief is that this favorable economic backdrop will translate into robust earnings growth for well-managed companies, in turn leading to better investment returns. We saw this in the last decade with the emerging markets equity asset class where country investment returns were highly correlated to nominal GDP growth. We have identified many companies that have the ability to generate positive and potentially sustainable double-digit earnings growth for many years to come. In fact, our bottom-up fundamental research shows that there are some companies with visible earnings growth that could potentially reach 100% over three years.
FRONTIER MARKETS IN A PORTFOLIO CONTEXT
Over the past five years, frontier markets significantly outperformed emerging markets and most developed market regions on a risk-adjusted basis, while exhibiting lower standard deviation than these asset classes (Figure 3). Efficient frontier analysis easily confirms the benefit of including an allocation to the asset class. Of course, we should still expect some volatility from frontier, markets but in a portfolio context, one of their key attributes is a very low level of correlation between other markets, and therefore, other asset classes, so, adding frontier market exposure to portfolios provides significant diversification benefits.
FIGURE 3: Frontier Markets Provided Attractive Risk-Adjusted Returns
As of June 30, 2017
Sources: FactSet and MSCI
Frontier economies are at an earlier stage of development and, in most cases, are not tied into global manufacturing supply chains and are therefore less impacted by global cycles. Even though frontier’s correlation with global stocks has increased over the last couple of years, it still remains very low at 0.44 (Figure 4). In the period in 2012 when correlations were higher, the UAE and Qatar were significant parts of the frontier asset class (since then reclassified to emerging market), and there was much higher participation from non-dedicated investors, a situation that tends to increase correlations as flows become more driven by global markets.
FIGURE 4: Frontier Markets if You Are Looking for Diversity
As of June 16, 2017
Sources: FactSet and MSCI
According to our research, the current level of this “crossover” or non-dedicated investment in frontier markets is extremely low, leaving us more comforted that the asset class should not be affected by their outflows (particularly the situation of non-dedicated investors cutting their “riskiest” or off-benchmark positions during tough times). Looking at the top 15 emerging market portfolios, only seven of them have any frontier market exposure, and typically, that consists of just one or two stock holdings (Figure 5). That leads us to advise that if you are seeking exposure you need a dedicated frontier portfolio to access the opportunity in these markets. Gaining exposure to a couple of holdings via your emerging market manager is not enough.
FIGURE 5: Largest Emerging Market Portfolios by Regional Exposure
As of June 30, 2017
Source: T. Rowe Price
Another attractive feature of frontier markets is the heterogeneity of individual frontier countries, making correlations between the countries themselves extremely low. Frontier markets are effectively “dancing to their own tune” with intercorrelations of, on average, 0.05 for the top 10 frontier markets versus 0.45 for the top 10 emerging markets, resulting in much lower than expected correlations and volatility.
One area where there is correlation with global trends is in the oil and commodity space. While the sector allocation is low (energy and materials represent 12.3% of the MSCI Frontier Markets Index1), several of the large index countries are net oil exporters and oil can represent a significant portion of fiscal revenues and impact overall economic health. The large oil exporters, are Kuwait, Oman, Kazakhstan, and Nigeria, along with non-index Saudi Arabia. There are also several countries largely dependent on at least one other commodity, although typically, these tend to be the smaller African nations (e.g., Zambia’s dependency on copper).
Frontier markets as a whole have therefore not been immune to the downward shift in oil and other commodities. However, many of the frontier countries have adjusted to the new oil price reality by tweaking budgets and currencies and are now, in many cases, much better positioned to weather future volatility. Some economies, such as Saudi Arabia’s, are also taking initiatives to diversify away from oil and commodity dependence by channeling investment across different sectors.
NOW COULD BE THE TIME TO INVEST IN FRONTIER
Now could potentially be a particularly good time to allocate to frontier markets in our opinion. Frontier investing is still in its formative stages with investment coverage relatively scarce, making the asset class much less efficient than its emerging and developed market counterparts. By making at least a small allocation to frontier today, and staying invested in what are predominantly long-term investment opportunities, clients can potentially achieve strong investment returns as companies and economies grow quickly from a very low base. While there may be pockets of volatility, the longer-term direction of travel is clear.
Supporting this argument are frontier markets’ low valuations, which look relatively attractive when compared with other asset classes. Frontier market performance, as measured by the MSCI Frontier Markets Index, peaked in August 2014, from which point the market declined by 36%—amid sluggish global growth and the end of the commodities boom—to reach a trough in January 2016. Since then, frontier markets rebounded 25% as of the end of June, but the index still trails its peak levels by a significant margin. Corporate earnings have meanwhile outpaced these returns, resulting in cheap valuation levels on an array of metrics (Figure 6).
FIGURE 6: Valuations Are Relatively Attractive Across Multiple Metrics
As of June 30, 2017
|Valuation Metrics||MSCI Frontier Markets||MSCI Emerging Markets||MSCI World|
|Return on Equity||11.8%||11.5%||11.2%|
Sources: FactSet and MSCI
Low valuations come in tandem with a continuation of positive macroeconomic change and resulting news flow. Recent examples include Argentina, which typifies the investment case for the asset class as we define it. President Mauricio Macri was elected in November 2015, and through his administration’s focus on market-friendly reform, he has successfully renewed investor confidence in the country, attracting record levels of FDI. Necessary adjustments to the fiscal budget and currency have helped return Argentina to positive growth and have been supportive to local businesses.
Another good example of a country in the earlier stages of macroeconomic transformation is Sri Lanka, where we recently took an investment trip. The country has weathered a two-year period of relative inactivity and consequent underperformance, prompting participation in an IMF program that includes the formulation and oversight of proactive economic plans. The coalition government elected in 2015 is showing some seriousness in driving reforms, and we see a gradual adjustment playing out with support from a new wave of FDI led by China, a visible construction boom, and increasing tourism. While some risks remain, well-run companies have been performing strongly and are well positioned for future growth.
WHY T. ROWE PRICE FOR FRONTIER MARKETS?
With the frontier markets strategy having just reached its third anniversary with almost 800 basis points of alpha (annualized) under its belt, we would like to highlight the key differentiators that have driven the outperformance versus both the benchmark and peers:
- The dedicated nature of the six-member frontier markets equity team is a particularly unique characteristic among competitors’ teams. Led by me, the team spends its time researching opportunities in frontier markets and spends much of this on the ground meeting with company management teams and industry experts in local frontier countries. The analysts and I apply the same high level of scrutiny and due diligence in our analysis as T. Rowe Price’s research platform has long been known for.
- We also leverage an advantage via our broad definition of frontier markets, investing in countries beyond the MSCI Frontier Markets Index that have attractive characteristics, such as Saudi Arabia and Georgia. Our opportunity set is not limited by the index, and over 50% of the companies we invest in are not currently represented in the MSCI Frontier Markets Index.
- Unlike other managers, we employ a “pure-only” approach to avoid overlap with emerging markets, and therefore do not invest in smaller emerging countries or in stocks of countries that have transitioned to emerging status.
- Our fixed income team, which has been covering these markets for a number of years, also offers invaluable support. The top-down approach of the fixed income analysts’ complements the bottom-up fundamental research of the equity analysts, providing them with the macroeconomic “weather forecast” that allows them to identify stocks with confidence.
- Finally, and linked to our first point, the team’s ability to identify opportunities before they become a consensus overweight, as pertains to both individual stocks and countries, has been a great success. A prime example has been our long-term positive view of companies in Vietnam. We were early to invest, holding over twice the index weight in 2014 and 2015. Our overweight to Vietnam was a significant contributor to performance in calendar years 2015 and 2016 as the investment thesis played out, with support from the lifting of foreign ownership restrictions on listed companies, which improved liquidity and stock market functioning. The country is now a consensus overweight with competitors mainly focused on Vietnam’s large-capitalization names.
This material is being furnished for general informational purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, and prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.
The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.
Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.
It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.
T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks or registered trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.