T. Rowe Price T. Rowe Price Trusty Logo

Price Point - In Brief

U.S. Fixed Income: Opposite Ends of Credit Spectrum Enhance Portfolio Positioning

Mark J. Vaselkiv, Chief Investment Officer of Fixed Income
Andrew McCormick, Head of U.S Taxable Bond Team

Executive Summary

  • While the Fed will probably raise rates at least twice more this year, pushing short-term rates higher, the pace is likely to remain gradual.
  • However, crosscurrents in the fixed income markets may help limit further yield increases on longer-term bonds even as the Fed hikes rates.
  • In this uncertain rate environment, a sound strategy involves overweight allocations to sectors with high credit quality as well as noninvestment-grade segments.
  • We believe this positioning can provide relatively low sensitivity to rate increases as well as the ability to benefit from rallies in sectors with credit risk.

Although the Federal Reserve has signaled that it will continue to gradually raise interest rates as 2017 progresses, longer-term yields appeared to reach a temporary equilibrium following the central bank’s March rate hike. The ongoing uncertainty about the ability of the Trump administration to implement tax cuts and fiscal expansion has created crosscurrents in the fixed income markets that may help limit further yield increases on longer-term bonds even as the Fed normalizes monetary policy.

While the Fed will probably raise rates at least twice more this year, pushing short-term rates incrementally higher, the pace of increases is likely to be far more gradual than in historical cycles of monetary policy tightening. In addition, the terminal rate—the highest level of the central bank’s target federal funds short-term benchmark in a tightening cycle—is considerably lower than in past cycles because of lower growth expectations. Investors fearful of rapidly rising rates might be tempted to abandon their fixed income allocations, but we think that this worry will prove to be unfounded. At the same time, from our point of view, investors should consider bond strategies with overweight allocations to opposite ends of the credit spectrum.


Accurately forecasting interest rate changes over longer time horizons is difficult. In addition to the Fed’s actions, many other factors influence U.S. yields. The policy stances of central banks outside the U.S. affect yields on other high-quality sovereign debt, which influences U.S. rates. For example, if Treasuries offer meaningfully higher currency-adjusted yields than German bunds, incremental investor demand can drive a decrease in Treasury rates.

A strengthening economy can push inflation expectations—and yields—higher. However, we think U.S. economic data may have reached a plateau, which may stabilize longer-term yields. Also, if the Trump administration is unable to enact the tax cuts and fiscal stimulus policies that many investors seem to anticipate, a reversal in sentiment toward risk could boost demand for intermediate- and long-maturity Treasuries and push their rates lower.


In terms of positioning in this uncertain rate environment, we think that a sound fixed income investment strategy involves combining overweight allocations to sectors with high credit quality, such as short-maturity asset-backed securities (ABS), with overweights to noninvestment-grade sectors, including both global high yield bonds and bank loans. ABS are backed by the cash flows from credit card receivables, auto loans, or other types of assets. We believe using opposite ends of the credit quality spectrum for portfolio positioning can provide an ideal combination of relatively low sensitivity to interest rate increases as well as the ability to benefit from rallies in sectors with credit risk.

The recent increase in short-term Treasury rates has actually made ABS more attractive by raising their yields, making them useful for a high-quality, relatively stable exposure in a taxable fixed income portfolio. Technical factors related to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s October 2016 reforms of the money market industry have also helped make ABS attractive. ABS generally have high credit ratings and are significantly more liquid than many other fixed income sectors, allowing us to quickly move into or out of individual positions at efficient prices.

Most ABS have short maturities, which is a valuable characteristic despite the likelihood that short-term rates will trend higher with the fed funds rate. Portfolio managers can reinvest the principal payments from maturing notes into new bonds issued at higher rates that pay more attractive coupons. 


At the opposite end of the credit spectrum, bank loans and global high yield bonds have relatively low sensitivity to rising rates and provide significant additional yield—albeit with elevated credit risk and lower liquidity. Floating rate bank loans are noninvestment-grade debt instruments that generally are less sensitive to changes in the market’s pricing of broad credit risk than bonds given loans’ higher positioning in a company’s capital structure. Loans feature coupon rates that adjust periodically based on the level of a benchmark interest rate, typically the three-month London interbank offered rate (LIBOR). As a result, bank loan holders enjoy higher coupon payments when short-term rates increase.

High yield bonds are also less sensitive to the negative price effects of rising rates. Noninvestment-grade bonds from issuers outside the U.S., where many central banks are maintaining their accommodative monetary policies, may be even more insulated from any increases in U.S. rates. In addition, the fundamental condition of many high yield issuers remains solid, with default rates expected to tick lower in 2017. 


As shown in Figure 1, all three of these sectors—ABS, global high yield, and bank loans—performed consistently in four separate 12-month time periods of rising interest rates over the last 15 years as well as during a period of about five months in mid- to late 2016. Bank loans and high yield bonds generated solidly positive returns in all time periods, while ABS consistently held up better than most other bond sectors. In today’s uncertain environment, adopting a credit barbell strategy using these components may provide some insulation from rising rates as well as the ability to benefit from improvements in sectors with higher credit risk. 

Figure 1: ABS, high yield bonds, and bank loans have generally fared well in past periods of rising rates. 

Total returns when 10-year Treasury yields increased by more than 100 basis points (bps) over 12 months
12 Months Ended 10-Year Treasury Yield Move Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Agg. Bond Index ABS High Yield Bank Loans
May 31, 2004 +130 bps -0.44% 1.06% 13.23% 7.50%
Jun. 30, 2006 120 -0.81 1.19 5.06 6.15
Dec. 31, 2009 162 5.93 24.72 58.90 52.53
Sep. 30, 2013 140 -1.68 -0.38 7.08 5.07
Total returns during the 2016 Treasury market sell-off
  10-Year Treasury Yield Move Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Agg. Bond Index ABS High Yield Bank Loans
Jul. 8, 2016– Dec. 16, 2016 +123 bps -4.38% -0.83% 5.82% 4.82%

Past performance cannot guarantee future results.
Sources: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., S&P/LSTA, and T. Rowe Price.
Bloomberg Index Services Ltd. Copyright® 2017, Bloomberg Index Services Ltd. Used with permission.

Important Information

This material, including any statements, information, data and content contained within it and any materials, information, images, links, graphics or recording provided in conjunction with this material are being furnished by T. Rowe Price for general informational purposes only. The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price. The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. The material does not constitute advice of any nature and prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The views contained herein are as of April 2017 and may have changed since that time.

USA (public)—Issued in the USA by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., and by T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD, 21202.

T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks or registered trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. in the United States, European Union, and other countries. This material is intended for use only in select countries.


Tap to dismiss


Latest Date Range
Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:
Download Cancel


Share Class: Language of the document:
Download Cancel
Sign in to manage subscriptions for products, insights and email updates.
Continue with sign in?
To complete sign in and be redirected to your registered country, please select continue. Select cancel to remain on the current site.
Continue Cancel
Once registered, you'll be able to start subscribing.

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). TRP has been independently verified for the twenty one- year period ended June 30, 2017 by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. Verification assesses whether (1) the firm has complied with all the composite construction requirements of the GIPS standards on a firm-wide basis and (2) the firm's policies and procedures are designed to calculate and present performance in compliance with the GIPS standards. Verification does not ensure the accuracy of any specific composite presentation.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest