Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:


Share Class: Language of the document:

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the twenty four-year period ended June 30, 2020, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest

Please enter valid search characters

EM Debt Reveals its Strength as a Growth Asset

Benjamin Robins, CFA, Portfolio Specialist

Investors seeking growth should focus on equities, and investors seeking stability should buy government bonds – or at least that’s the common assumption. But in emerging markets (EM), history tells a radically different story. Over the past 30 years, hard-currency government bonds have delivered far more growth than equities. Why is this, and what are the implications?

The chart shows the cumulative performances of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified bond index and the MSCI Emerging Markets equity index since the end of 1993. US$100 invested in equities at the beginning of the period would have more than trebled over time, but an investment in bonds would have grown more than nine-fold.

Notice the smoother trajectory of the bond index. The chart spans several major market events including the Asian and Russian crises of the 1990s and the Global Financial Crisis. At times of market stress, bonds fell by significantly less than equities (2008 is a case in point). These smaller setbacks have allowed a more powerful compounding effect for bonds, resulting in the outperformance we’ve seen.

There are three key differences accounting for bonds’ lower volatility and smaller capital losses, and these relate to currency, issuer and income.   

Growth of US$100 in Emerging Market Bonds and Equities 
31 December 1993 – 30 September 2019

Graph: Growth of US$100 in Emerging Market Bonds and Equities


Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Source: JP Morgan, MSCI. Data analysis by T. Rowe Price.
Bonds: JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Index; Equities: MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

  1. Hedged vs. unhedged currency exposure: The bond index is a hard currency index, hedged to US dollars. The equity index is not currency hedged, so it carries EM local currency risk. EM currencies can be rewarding, but they are also volatile. Taking purely passive index exposure to local currency assets has not paid off in recent decades, largely due to a strong upward trend in the US dollar: EM currencies have depreciated by roughly 20% against the dollar since 2003.1 (One takeaway from this, in our view, is not necessarily that local currency investments should be avoided, but that they should be actively managed and selected to control potential volatility.)

  2. Government vs. corporate issuers: The bond index consists of government and government-related debt, whereas the issuers in the equity index are companies. Countries generally have less bankruptcy risk than companies, and governments’ capacity to keep up their bond interest payments is supported by their ability to raise funds via taxes.

  3. Coupon vs. dividend income. EM hard-currency sovereign debt has generated a significant portion of its returns from coupon payments, which are a more stable source of returns than capital appreciation, and a more stable source of income returns than equity dividends.

Investment Implications

This does not imply that investors should shun EM equities. In the right environment, equities have the potential to outperform EM debt and other asset classes. What it does suggest is that passive index exposure is not the best way to invest. We believe that significantly better outcomes can be achieved using active management to mitigate the risks, and to select the best growth and dividend opportunities from the large and diverse pool of EM equities available. 

Opening Quote There is more to hard currency EM debt than just stability: it is also potentially a powerful source of long-term growth. Closing Quote

The benefits of EM hard currency debt still apply, in our view. Coupons remain attractive relative to those in developed markets. In terms of credit quality, we have seen a trend of structural reforms in much of the EM world, and we see that continuing. And, while there may be periods where local currencies outperform on a country-by-country basis, we expect the overall weakness and volatility of local currency markets to continue in the longer term, so hard-currency EM exposure still makes sense.

In short, we believe that investors searching for the best risk‑adjusted returns should still look actively at both equity and fixed income issuers. But they should remember that there is more to hard currency EM debt than just stability: it is also potentially a powerful source of long-term growth.


1 Source: J.P. Morgan, as of August 30, 2019


Additional Disclosures

Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The index is used with permission. The Index may not be copied, used, or distributed without J.P. Morgan’s prior written approval. Copyright © 2019, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

MSCI and its affiliates and third party sources and providers (collectively, “MSCI”) makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. Historical MSCI data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the MSCI data is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such.


Important Information

This material is being furnished for general informational purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, and prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.