Skip to main content

Choose your location

Current selection

Canada
English
Canada
United States
Asia Regional
Australia
New Zealand
Austria
Belgium
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom

Download

Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:

Download

Share Class: Language of the document:

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
Subscriptions
OK
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the twenty four-year period ended June 30, 2020, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest

December 2021 / U.S. EQUITIES

Dividend Growers Look Appealing as Market Headwinds Increase

Selectivity and diligence are keys to long‑term compounding.

Key Insights

  • Relatively attractive valuations and the appeal of dividend growth during periods of inflation and moderate equity market returns could benefit our strategy.
  • We seek high‑quality names that we believe have the potential to compound returns over a full market cycle by growing their cash flow and dividend consistently.
  • Our low‑turnover style relies on rigorous due diligence that goes beyond the numbers to assess the potential sustainability of each holding’s dividend growth.

Elevated equity valuations, persistent inflation, continued headwinds to containing the coronavirus pandemic, and the prospect of central banks adjusting their policies after a period of extraordinary support—macro‑level controversies abound and have dominated the headlines.

These uncertainties create a challenging (and noisy) near‑term environment for investors that could burnish the relative appeal of companies with a track record of consistent dividend growth. Our strategy’s value proposition is longer term in nature, as we strive to buy and hold names that we believe can compound value over an extended period by steadily increasing their cash flows and payouts to shareholders.

Rigorous due diligence is the bedrock of our low‑turnover strategy. We continually test our assumptions and evaluate our existing and prospective holdings to ascertain whether we think their underlying business fundamentals can sustain a solid level of cash flow and dividend growth over the long haul.

A Near‑Term Case for Dividend Growers

The setup for the broader U.S. equity market strikes us as increasingly challenging.

The forward price‑to‑earnings ratio for the S&P 500 Index appears elevated on a historical basis (Figure 1) and the Federal Reserve plans to start winding down its monthly asset purchases, suggesting that further upside in stock prices is likely to depend more heavily on earnings growth—as opposed to expansion in valuation multiples.

U.S. Equity Market Valuations Look Elevated on Historical Basis

(Fig. 1) S&P 500 Index price to forward earnings*

U.S. Equity Market Valuations Look Elevated on Historical Basis

Twenty years ended October 31, 2021.
*Next 12 months
Source: T. Rowe Price analysis using data and analytics provided by FactSet Research Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. See Additional Disclosures. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from expectations.

Meanwhile, net profit margins for the S&P 500 Index have surged beyond their 20‑year high (Figure 2), lifted in part by the strength of the economic recovery and the cost‑cutting measures that corporations have implemented during the pandemic. Sustaining such a high level of profitability and clearing the high bar of earnings expectations embedded in prevailing valuations could be a difficult proposition, even more so if recent inflationary pressures persist.

Corporate Profitability Above Historical Peaks

(Fig. 2) S&P 500 Index net profit margins (trailing 12 months)

Corporate Profitability Above Historical Peaks

Twenty years ended October 31, 2021.
Source: Financial data and analytics provider FactSet. Copyright 2021 FactSet. All Rights Reserved. See Additional Disclosures.

Dividend‑oriented stocks are not necessarily insulated from the challenges the broader market faces.

However, in our view, valuations for the established, free cash flow‑generating names that we gravitate toward generally appear less demanding on a relative basis—especially when compared with many of the high‑flying stocks that investors bid up during a period of extraordinarily accommodative policies from the Fed and other central banks. Some speculation likely stemmed in part from the low risk‑free rate of return, as measured by U.S. Treasury yields, which can encourage investors to pay higher near‑term valuation multiples for expected earnings that are further and further out into the future. As the Fed begins to wind down its stimulative policies, the potential for the market to refocus on business fundamentals could favor high‑quality companies that are viewed as shorter‑duration assets because they have generated meaningful cash flows, have a record of paying healthy dividends, and exhibit the potential for steady growth.

A lower‑return environment for equities could also boost the relative appeal of stocks that offer the prospect of a market‑like yield and the potential for an extended run of above‑average dividend growth. Past is not always prologue, as demonstrated by the atypical market action that occurred during and after the unprecedented pandemic‑driven contraction. But we believe historical market data offer some evidence of dividend growers’ relative resilience in difficult markets. An analysis conducted by T. Rowe Price shows that dividend growth stocks in the large‑capitalization Russell 1000 Index outperformed the benchmark during down and flat markets over the 35 years ended December 31, 2020 (Figure 3). 

Dividend Growers Have Outperformed in Down and Flat Markets

(Fig. 3) Performance in various market environments by dividend policy1

Dividend Growers Have Outperformed in Down and Flat Markets

As of December 31, 2020.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Source: Data provided by Compustat (see Additional Disclosures); data analysis by T. Rowe Price.
1Based on rolling 12-month returns, measured monthly, from December 31, 1985, to December 31, 2020. At the start of every month, T. Rowe Price categorizes the Russell 1000 Index into various categories depending on dividend policy. We then calculate that month’s market cap-weighted returns for each category. We accumulate the returns during the full periods and calculate the annualized total returns for each category. Dividend growers consist of companies whose dividend growth over the prior 12 months was greater than zero. Dividend payers consist of companies whose current dividend yield is greater than zero. Non-dividend payers consist of companies whose current dividend yield equals zero.

And unlike securities that are expected to generate the bulk of their total return from an above‑average yield, companies that have the potential to grow their cash flows and dividends through the cycle may be able to offset at least some of the erosive effects that inflation and higher interest rates can have on the value of future cash flows. We run our portfolio as a high dividend growth strategy, as opposed to one that focuses on stocks sporting high dividend yields.

...companies that have the potential to grow their cash flows and dividends through the cycle may be able to offset at least some of the erosive effects that inflation and higher interest rates can have on the value of future cash flows.

How are we viewing the business risks that may accompany rising interest rates? Consider our bottom‑up investment decisions in materials and industrials and business services, sectors that usually exhibit higher levels of sensitivity to economic conditions and rising input costs. Here, we focus on high‑quality names that we believe should experience less volatility in cash flows and profit margins and have the potential to grow through the cycle. Possible near‑term cost headwinds aside, we feel good about the pricing power and longer‑run growth prospects of our specialty chemical, industrial gas, and railroad holdings.

Focused on the Long Haul

By design, our patient approach takes a long view as we seek to tap the power of compounding. We work closely with our global team of research analysts to build a deep understanding of each company in which we invest, assess the potential durability of its growth prospects, and analyze how competitive dynamics in its industry might evolve.

The search for potential dividend growers typically leads us to companies that have generated meaningful free cash flow—or the cash that is left over after the expenditures needed to run and maintain the existing business. But free cash flow can be a blessing or a curse, depending on how intelligently a company’s management team chooses to allocate this capital. Bad acquisitions or other strategic missteps can be costly from both a financial and a reputational perspective, even for resilient business models that might be able to absorb some unforced errors.  

For this reason, we spend a great deal of time delving into management’s motivations and decision‑making to gauge whether we believe they have the potential to be good stewards of capital and create value for shareholders. We also evaluate each company’s systems and culture, which can play an important role in the consistency and repeatability of the internal factors driving cash flow generation. These intangibles, in our experience, can provide useful insights into the sustainability of a company’s growth story.

An acceleration in the innovation‑driven disruption of many legacy business models over the past decade has made the market quick to discount any potential secular risk that might be on the horizon. Even if a company’s earnings and cash flow are stable and its dividend is still increasing, fears of future disruption can compress a stock’s valuation multiple to the point that it can be a significant performance headwind. Accordingly, differentiating between cyclical and secular risk is critical.

To aid our risk management efforts, we spend a good deal of time working with our analysts who cover the technology‑driven disruptors seeking to siphon off cash flows from established businesses. We may not be able to invest in the dominant U.S. online media and e‑commerce platforms that do not pay a dividend; however, understanding their business models and strategies continues to inform how we invest in traditional retail, media, and telecommunication companies. In the consumer discretionary sector, for instance, we focus on retailers, such as Home Depot, that we believe have defensible business models and appealing growth potential, thanks to a strong online presence for ordering and/or differentiated in‑store shopping experiences.

At the same time, our mandate does not preclude us from investing behind some of the well‑known tailwinds that have provided fundamental and narrative support for high‑growth stocks. We seek potential dividend growers whose business models could offer the durable growth and reasonable valuations that we prize while also standing to benefit, in our view, from powerful secular trends. Key transformations where we are finding opportunities include the wave of innovation‑fueled capital investment taking place in drug development as well as accelerating adoption of cloud computing, digital payments, clean energy, and electric vehicles.

...our mandate does not preclude us from investing behind some of the well‑known tailwinds that have provided fundamental and narrative support for high‑growth stocks.

We believe that longtime holding Microsoft, for instance, offers exposure to accelerating adoption of cloud‑based software and services by enterprise—a powerful secular trend that appears to have significant room to run. We do not own the stock because of inertia or its large enterprise value and prominent weighting in the S&P 500 Index; rather, we appreciate the potential durability of the technology giant’s growth story, management’s commitment to returning capital to shareholders, and a valuation that does not seem overly expensive relative to its multiyear business prospects. We also see opportunity in utilities, a traditional dividend‑paying sector where we believe that the market does not fully appreciate the potential cash flow growth from investments in renewable energy and modernizing the transmission grid. For example, Florida‑based NextEra Energy strikes us as potentially well positioned to try to take advantage of these trends.

In these uncertain times, we remain committed to our long-standing process and the ongoing due diligence needed to determine whether we believe our holdings have the potential to sustain above‑average dividend growth over a longer time frame.

What We’re Watching Next

We are always on the lookout for any near‑term dislocations, broad‑based or company‑specific, that could create a compelling opportunity in dividend growers that meet our criteria for quality and potential sustainability. Of particular interest are instances where near‑term fears of inflationary pressure may have caused the market to lose sight of a company’s longer‑run growth story and the potential catalysts that could help to shift the narrative and unlock value for shareholders. 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This material is being furnished for general informational purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, and prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources' accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.  

It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Canada—Issued in Canada by T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc.’s investment management services are only available to Accredited Investors as defined under National Instrument 45-106. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. enters into written delegation agreements with affiliates to provide investment management services.

© 2021 T. Rowe Price. All rights reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the bighorn sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks or registered trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Previous Article

December 2021 / GLOBAL EQUITIES

Asia ex-Japan 2022 Market Outlook
Next Article

December 2021 / VIDEO

2022 Global Market Outlook Webcast
202111‑1929561

You are now leaving the T. Rowe Price website

T. Rowe Price is not responsible for the content of third party websites, including any performance data contained within them. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.