Download

Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:

Download

Share Class: Language of the document:

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
Subscriptions
OK
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the twenty four-year period ended June 30, 2020, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest

Please enter valid search characters

Asset Allocation Insights

Are Stocks Actually Expensive?

Sébastien Page, CFA, Head of Global Multi-Asset

Executive Summary

Investors may be wondering if stocks are too expensive, given their massive rally from the market bottom amid grim data. We think stocks are closer to their fair value because low interest rates can sustain higher valuations, low expectations allow for an upside surprise, and extensive stimulus measures are counteracting effects of a temporary shock.

Transcript

There’s a popular narrative at the moment that stocks are outrageously expensive because we’ve had a massive rally from the bottom and the economic and the earnings data are really, really bad at the moment. So it’s easy to think that the stock market has gotten ahead of itself.

However, I would argue that stocks are closer to fairly valued. Let me give three reasons. First, interest rates. Second, expectations. And third, the stimulus measures.

On interest rates, we started the year 1.9% on the US 10-year treasury, and now, we’re below .9%, so we’re 100 basis points lower. All else being equal, valuation models tell us that when rates drop, we can sustain higher valuations.
On expectations, I would argue that expectations are low. You see this in sentiment indicators, for example. This is not a rally that is well liked. CFTC net speculative positions, so hedge funds for example, are showing massively short positions.

Also, another piece of evidence that expectations are fairly low is that, unlike prior stock market recoveries, value stocks, small cap stocks, emerging markets stocks, haven’t rallied really hard up until very, very recently. In fact, those three indices, small cap stocks, value stocks, emerging markets stocks, are all still down 9% year to date.

So this lack of rotation into more cyclical asset classes within stock markets shows that expectations are still fairly low. One way to think about expectations is that suppose that everyone expects that the economy will open at 20% for the next eight to 12 months, and that we actually reopen at 50% sooner rather than later. This will cause positive surprises in a lot of the underlying data.

On the size of the stimulus, this has been massive, more than twice the size of the stimulus for the 2008-2009 crisis plus the QEs 1, 2 and three. So this gives you an idea of the magnitude of both fiscal and monetary stimulus measures that have been deployed globally, in the context of what is fundamentally a temporary shock.

And when I say that I don’t mean that the economy will recover very quickly or that we won’t see any permanent damage. But fundamentally, once we get a vaccine and the pandemic gets under control, we have a lot of jobs that will return almost automatically in the restaurant industry, in the leisure and hospitality industries. So massive stimulus, a bridge for what is fundamentally a temporary shock despite some permanent damage.

So investors should think about their asset allocation especially from a long-term perspective, as, look, now is not the time to be a hero and being well diversified between stocks and bonds when we think there are still risks, for example, the U.S. election around stocks. It makes sense to be strategically well diversified across stocks and bond markets.

202006-1218995