When my team and I met recently, as is often the case, we started with a discussion of what we think is the consensus in the market right now, and where we think that consensus could prove to be wrong as we look toward the new year.
We came away with three main ideas that we think are contrarian themes that go against the market consensus.
First, we think the market’s current consensus of a stagflationary environment, in which growth is stagnant but inflation is high, is likely to prove incorrect.
The stagflationist view is that rampant inflation will depress demand, leading to low growth and high inflation like what was seen in the 1970s, which was a terrible time to be invested in stocks. We think that’s highly unlikely. We think that most of the inflation that we’re currently experiencing in the U.S. is a function of temporary supply tightness and logistical issues, which in turn are a function of labor shortages related to COVID-19 and the impact of associated fiscal policies used to combat the pandemic, such as the CARES Act or the Paycheck Protection Program. We believe that as the virus recedes and direct government payments to individuals cease, workers will return to their posts, and much of the inflationary pressure that we have experienced this year will abate.
In fact, while nothing is impossible, we would say that it is mathematically implausible that inflation can continue at 2021’s pace. Inflation has been driven by too many one-offs that are simply unlikely to repeat in 2022. Used car prices, for instance, are up 21% this year. Does anyone really think they’ll be up another 21% next year? That sounds like a stretch to us.
That gets us to our second non-consensus view, which is that it’s time to “short the shortages.” The mainstream news media is filled with stories about product shortages and supply chain bottlenecks. Telling you that Christmas is canceled this year is a great way for them to keep your eyes glued to the TV screen, but don’t buy it. Prices and backlogs for everything from soybeans to steel to shipping containers and semiconductors rose to unsustainable levels this year, but many are already showing signs of having peaked. Many commodity prices such as iron ore are past their peak, port congestion is showing signs of easing, and semiconductor inventories are actually rising. We think there may be an opportunity to try to take some profits in these areas of the market.
Our final non-consensus view is that it’s time to get more constructive on China into 2022. We think a way to make money trading the Chinese market is just to listen to what the government tells you. In late 2020, the Chinese government made clear its intentions to decrease stimulus in 2021. That meant that money supply growth would decline and total social financing would decrease, leading to a downcycle in credit. And that’s exactly what happened. In 2021, Chinese bond yields rose, equities declined, and the credit market is now plagued by distress surrounding the defaults of property companies.
Now, however, the tone from the government is starting to change. With the property market accounting for a quarter of the country’s GDP by some estimates, they can’t simply allow a massive sector-wide default. We think that the well-publicized default of a few of the weaker players will be contained and may in retrospect represent the bottoming of the Chinese credit cycle. The central bank already cut interest rates, and now the government is telling the banks to continue to extend credit to property developers for existing projects. Signals like that are usually a good indicator that it’s time to start getting more constructive on Chinese assets as we head to 2022.
- We have identified three contrarian investing ideas.
- We think the market’s current consensus of a stagflationary environment, in which growth is stagnant but inflation is high, is likely to prove incorrect.
- We also think product shortages and supply chain bottlenecks are likely peaking and that it’s time to get constructive on China.
This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investment advice or a recommendation to take any particular investment action.
The views contained herein are those of the authors as of November 2021 and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price associates.
This information is not intended to reflect a current or past recommendation concerning investments, investment strategies, or account types, advice of any kind, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or investment services. The opinions and commentary provided do not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular investor or class of investor. Please consider your own circumstances before making an investment decision.
Information contained herein is based upon sources we consider to be reliable; we do not, however, guarantee its accuracy. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from any forward-looking statements made.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All investments are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. International investments can be riskier than U.S. investments due to the adverse effects of currency exchange rates, differences in market structure and liquidity, as well as specific country, regional, and economic developments. These risks are generally greater for investments in emerging markets. Commodity prices can be subject to extreme volatility and significant price swings. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.
T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
© 2021 T. Rowe Price. All rights reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the bighorn sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks or registered trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.