February 2020 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS
North American Trade Pact: More Certainty, Muted Impact
Agreement offers political points for both parties.
Since the beginning of his 2016 presidential campaign, President Donald Trump has vowed to abandon trade agreements he believes hurt the U.S. economy. By replacing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with the U.S.‑Mexico‑Canada Agreement (USMCA), the president can state that he fulfilled his commitment to eliminate, in his words, “the worst trade deal of all time”—another step in his “Promises Made, Promises Kept” campaign.
But the new agreement—while perhaps having an only limited economic impact—offers talking points for those across the political spectrum.
In Trade, Much Like Politics, Timing Is Everything
Given the proximity of 2020 elections, U.S. politicians from both parties felt pressure to tout USMCA as an opportunity to help their constituents.
The president, beyond the headline fulfilling a key campaign promise, can say he’s cut a better deal for American companies, agriculture, and workers. His chief trade negotiator, Robert Lighthizer, claims that bipartisan support for the USMCA shows “you can have a permanent trade policy if you get the balance right.”
Democrats especially were eager to get on board with the agreement. In 2018, they took control of the House by winning some swing districts that are suburban and more politically moderate. Passing the USMCA allows the party to demonstrate that it engaged in bipartisan negotiations and action during a legislative session defined by impeachment.
By touting that they achieved more stringent labor provisions within the USMCA, Democrats also can argue that they pushed through changes that will improve economic prospects for working Americans. Notably, the AFL‑CIO, the nation’s largest union federation, reluctantly signed off on the pact. Democrats also forestalled extended patent protections for biologic drugs, which will enable less‑expensive, generic competition in the marketplace.
As of mid‑January, the USMCA had been approved by both houses of the U.S. Congress and by the Mexican government. Canada’s passage of the accord will be required for full ratification.
The USMCA’s Incremental Impact
Both Republicans and Democrats can claim victories in the new North American trade deal.
Though the USMCA provides more trade certainty, the new accord between the United States and its two largest trading partners only incrementally alters the status quo. An International Monetary Fund (IMF) analysis found that the USMCA’s impact on the U.S. gross domestic product would be negligible in its current form, though the IMF said it would result in some material gain on specific industries, “mostly driven by improved market access.”
Among the changes: 75% of automotive parts will have to be manufactured in the U.S. to qualify for duty‑free treatment, up from 62.5% in NAFTA; 40% of cars’ values (45% for light trucks) must be assembled by workers earning a minimum USD 16‑an‑hour wage. (While this change will result in higher costs for U.S. manufacturers, T. Rowe Price auto analyst Joel Grant expects the U.S. auto industry to adjust.)
Moreover, the deal also will remove the Trump administration’s tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from Canadian and Mexican firms. The Canadian dairy market, long closed to U.S. farmers, also will be more accessible. And the pact gives U.S. technology companies the freedom to transfer and store data across North American borders.
Pact Could Boost Confidence
While the USMCA makes modest changes to NAFTA, we believe it could be a significant contribution toward greater stability in North American trade by giving U.S. businesses more confidence to invest—even if that benefit comes from the reversal of uncertainty created by the Trump administration’s initial threat to withdraw from NAFTA.
This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.
The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.
Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources' accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.
It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.