Skip to main content

July 2021 / ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE

Shareholder Proposals in Focus

Where proxy voting is concerned, our overarching objective is to vote our clients’ shares in a thoughtful, investment-centered way.

In 2020, the T. Rowe Price portfolios voted on 1,431 shareholder resolutions across all markets. Of those, 500 were situations where shareholders were nominating directors to a company’s board. Another 585 were resolutions asking companies to adopt a specific corporate governance practice. 346 were social and environmental resolutions.

Voting Framework: Principles-Based or Case by Case?

When it comes to proxy voting issues, there is some debate as to the best approach: is it best to look at each issue individually and consider the company’s circumstances or to apply a set of principles evenly across all companies? In our view, the answer is both.

There are many areas within proxy voting where a principles-based approach can be implemented effectively. For example, our proxy voting guidelines are generally designed to promote an appropriate level of board independence, robust shareholder rights, and strong linkage over time between executives’ compensation and company performance. However, there are other areas where a case-by-case approach is necessary in order to achieve full alignment between our guidelines and our voting outcomes.

One area where this is very much the case is shareholder resolutions. The main reason shareholder resolutions are hard to implement with a principles-based voting approach is because they are more nuanced than other proxy voting categories. For example, we employ an objective set of indicators to determine a director’s independence. It is a straightforward decision to vote against existing directors and indicate to the company that they should be replaced with independent board members. Shareholder proposals can call for the company to make a change, but also to employ a prescriptive method to do so. We often find ourselves agreeing with a proponent that a company’s environmental or social disclosure is inadequate. However, we do not always agree with the prescriptive remedy put forth.


It is important to note that our overall framework for integrating ESG factors into our investment process— which includes proxy voting—is research-centered.

Its purpose is to produce investment insights for our internal teams of analysts and portfolio managers.

As a global asset manager serving clients with different perspectives, beliefs, time horizons, and investment goals, it is not our objective to build our investment strategies around a specific set of values. Instead, our objective is to use different lenses (environmental, social, ethical, and governance) to deepen our understanding of the investments held in our clients’ portfolios.

There are areas where a case-by-case approach is necessary.

The Importance of an Investment Focused Framework

The quality, intent, and utility of shareholder resolutions on ESG matters are highly variable. Some well- targeted resolutions are extremely helpful in persuading companies to strengthen their management of certain risks, leading to improved outcomes for investors. Other resolutions are not helpful—we would even call them harmful—if the objectives of the proponent do not align with economically oriented long-term investors. This is why we believe the most responsible approach to voting such resolutions is to apply a thoughtful, investment-focused framework.
 

Shareholder Resolutions Voted on in 2020
Shareholder Resolutions Voted on in 2020

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources' accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date noted on the material and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.  

It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Previous Article

July 2021 / INVESTMENT INSIGHTS

How Weighing ESG Risks Adds an Edge in EM Corporates
Next Article

July 2021 / MARKETS & ECONOMY

Central Bank Digital Currencies May Bring “Helicopter Money” Closer
202107-1720838

You are now leaving the T. Rowe Price website

T. Rowe Price is not responsible for the content of third party websites, including any performance data contained within them. Past performance cannot guarantee future results.